# Evaluation of Hand Function Using Relative Motion Extension Concept (with or Without Night Wrist Orthosis) or Dynamic Extension Orthosis for Extensor Tendon Injuries in Zones 4–6—A Randomized Controlled Trial

**Authors:** Vida Bojnec, Jerneja Vidmar, Zvezdana Sužnik, Aleksandra Orož Koprivnik, Milena Špes Škrlec, Maša Frangež, Neža Majdič, Gaj Vidmar, Breda Jesenšek Papež

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/life15020249 · Life · 2025-02-06

## TL;DR

This study compares hand function recovery methods for extensor tendon injuries, finding that the RME-only approach is as effective as using an orthosis.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that the RME-only protocol is non-inferior to RME-plus and superior to DEO for hand function recovery.

## Key findings

- RME-only and RME-plus groups showed better hand function and grip strength than the DEO group.
- No significant differences were found in patient adherence or satisfaction between the RME and DEO protocols.
- RME-only is safe and effective for single extensor tendon injuries in zones 4–6.

## Abstract

This study aimed to compare outcomes of early active motion (EAM) using the relative motion extension (RME) approach to outcomes of early passive motion (EPM) with a dynamic extension orthosis (DEO) and to evaluate whether the RME-only approach is equivalent to the RME-plus approach. Fifty adults were randomized into one of the three intervention groups receiving the DEO, RME only, or RME plus orthosis. The score of the Jebsen–Taylor hand function test (JTHFT) without writing and QuickDASH at T1, all measures of mobility at T1 and T2, and grip strength were better in the RME-only and RME-plus group compared to the DEO group, whereas the values of Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM) at T1 and T2, as well as QuickDASH score at T2, orthosis adherence, and the patient’s comfort while wearing the orthoses did not statistically significantly differ among the three groups. The RME concept after extensor tendon injuries in zones 4–6 is superior to the DEO protocol in terms of earlier regain of hand function. The DEO and RME protocols were equivalent regarding patients’ adherence and satisfaction with the orthosis. We found no differences in the RME-plus and RME-only protocols, indicating the safe use of the RME-only protocol in single extensor tendon injuries in zones 4–6.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Extensor Tendon Injuries (MESH:D013708), Wrist Orthosis (MESH:D014954)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856411/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856411/full.md

## References

56 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856411/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856411