# Inherited Hypertrabeculation? Genetic and Clinical Insights in Blood Relatives of Genetically Affected Left Ventricular Excessive Trabeculation Patients

## TL;DR

This study explores the genetic and clinical characteristics of blood relatives of patients with genetically caused left ventricular excessive trabeculation (LVET), highlighting the need for screening and follow-up.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the inheritance and clinical relevance of LVET in family members of affected individuals.

## Key findings

- 78% of families and 38% of relatives carried the index mutation associated with LVET.
- 33% of relatives met Jenni-LVET criteria and showed lower LV_EF values.
- ECG and ECHO parameters were mostly normal, but genetic and morphological involvement was frequent.

## Abstract

Genetically determined left ventricular excessive trabeculation (LVET) has a wide clinical spectrum ranging from asymptomatic subjects to severe heart failure with arrhythmias and thromboembolic events. Unlike other cardiomyopathies, the relatives of LVET patients never reach the spotlight of guidelines and clinical practice, although these family members can be often affected by these conditions. Thus, we aimed to investigate the relatives of LVET by multidimensional analysis, such as genetic testing, ECG and cardiac ultrasound (ECHO). We included 55 blood relatives from the family of 18 LVET patients (male = 27, age = 44 ± 20.8y), who underwent anamnesis registration. With Sanger sequencing, the relatives were classified into genetically positive (GEN-pos) and unaffected (GEN-neg) subgroups. In addition to regular ECG parameters, Sokolow-Lyon Index (SLI) values were calculated. 2D ECHO images were analysed with TomTec Arena, evaluating LV volumetric, functional (EF) and strain parameters. Individuals were categorized into JENNI-pos and JENNI-neg morphological subgroups according to the Jenni LVET ECHO criteria. Family history showed frequent involvement (arrhythmia 61%, stroke 56%, syncope 39%, sudden cardiac death 28%, implanted device 28%), as well as personal anamnesis (subjective symptoms 75%, arrhythmias 44%). ECG and ECHO parameters were within the normal range. In terms of genetics, 78% of families and 38% of relatives carried the index mutation. LV_SLI and QT duration were lower in the GEN-pos group; ECHO parameters were comparable in the subgroups. Morphologically, 33% of the relatives met Jenni-LVET criteria were genetically affected and showed lower LV_EF values. The frequently found genetic, morphological and clinical involvement may indicate the importance of screening and, if necessary, regular follow-up of relatives in the genetically affected LVET population.