# Development of a Lateral Longitudinal Arch Evaluation Method for the Foot Using Ultrasonography: Validation With Radiography and Verification of Intrarater and Interrater Reliability

**Authors:** Daichi Kawamura, Takashi Komatsu, Masanobu Suto, Hikaru Narita, Yasuyuki Umezaki, Saki Takahashi, Hiroshi Shinohara

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/jfa2.70039 · Journal of Foot and Ankle Research · 2025-02-25

## TL;DR

This study developed a reliable and non-invasive ultrasound method to measure the lateral longitudinal arch of the foot, validated against radiography.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is a validated ultrasonography method for measuring the cuboid height, a key indicator of the lateral longitudinal arch.

## Key findings

- Ultrasonography measurements of cuboid height strongly correlated with radiography (r = 0.98).
- Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were almost perfect (ICCs of 0.98 and 0.99).
- The method is noninvasive, cost-effective, and suitable for clinical use in evaluating lateral foot structures.

## Abstract

The lateral longitudinal arch (LLA) is an essential structure of the foot. However, LLA evaluation methods remain underexplored compared to those of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA). This study sought to develop a method for measuring the cuboid height, the keystone of the LLA, using ultrasonography and to verify its correlation with radiography, as well as intrarater and interrater reliability.

This cross‐sectional study included 21 university students (14 males and seven females). The cuboid height was measured using radiography and ultrasonography. The validity of ultrasonographic measurements was assessed through correlation with radiographic measurements and Bland–Altman analysis. Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

A strong correlation was observed between cuboid heights measured using radiography and ultrasonography (r = 0.98, p < 0.01). The Bland–Altman analysis revealed a fixed bias of −0.71 mm (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: −0.96 to −0.46 mm). Intrarater and interrater reliability for ultrasonographic measurements were almost perfect, with ICCs of 0.98 and 0.99, respectively.

Cuboid height measurements using ultrasonography demonstrated high validity and reliability. This method offers a noninvasive and cost‐effective alternative to radiography, with potential clinical applications in the evaluation of LLA and related conditions such as cuboid syndrome and lateral foot injuries.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** lateral foot injuries (MESH:D018409), cuboid syndrome (MESH:D013577)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856052/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856052/full.md

## References

24 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856052/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856052