# Influence of Prosthesis Position on Pacing Burden and Long-Term Survival in TAVI Patients with New Pacemaker

**Authors:** Ramona Schmitt, Yannick Salz-Sculean, Klaus Kaier, Constantin von zur Mühlen, Johannes Brado, Manuel Hein, Martin Soschynski, Christopher L. Schlett, Franz-Josef Neumann, Dirk Westermann, Philipp Ruile, Philipp Breitbart

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041265 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2025-02-14

## TL;DR

This study found that the position of a heart valve implant after surgery does not affect the need for pacing or patient survival over five years.

## Contribution

The study shows that valve position does not predict pacing burden or survival, and some patients develop pacing needs over time.

## Key findings

- High pacing burden was observed in 69% of patients before discharge and 67% after three months.
- One-third of patients with low initial pacing burden developed high pacing burden within three months.
- Valve position had no significant effect on pacing burden or survival over five years.

## Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of three-dimensional transcatheter heart valve (THV) position on mid-term pacing burdens and to examine the effect of stimulation rates on survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: In patients receiving a new PPM before discharge after TAVI, we analyzed the final three-dimensional THV position in 107 patients (78 with Sapien S3 THV and 29 with Evolut R THV) using fusion imaging from pre- and post-TAVI computed tomography angiography. The PPM stimulation rates were examined pre-discharge and after 3 months. Patient survival was tracked over a period of 5 years. Results: A high pacing burden (stimulation rate of >20%) was observed in 69% of patients before discharge and in 67% after three months. One-third of the patients with an initial low pacing burden developed a high pacing burden after 3 months. The implantation depth did not differ between patients with or without a high pacing burden at discharge (p = 0.550) or after 3 months (p = 0.901). The three-dimensional THV position showed no influence on the pacing burden pre-discharge (p = 0.550) and after 3 months (0.901). There were no significant differences in survival, regardless of the pacing burden pre-discharge and after 3 months (log-rank p = 0.676). Conclusions: Three-dimensional THV position did not predict a high pacing burden after TAVI. Pacing burden was not associated with survival. One-third of patients experienced an increase to a high pacing burden within 3 months, suggesting potential long-term conduction system damage after TAVI.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** conduction system damage (MESH:D057772)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856047/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856047/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856047/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11856047