# BRM: From Skin-Reducing Mastectomy to the New Concept of Breast Reshaping Mastectomy

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new surgical concept called Breast Reshaping Mastectomy to improve both safety and aesthetics in breast reconstruction.

## Contribution

The paper proposes a unified framework called BRM to standardize and clarify skin-sparing mastectomy techniques.

## Key findings

- BRM integrates four key elements: skin incision, implant coverage, NAC management, and reconstruction timing.
- Standardizing BRM techniques can improve surgical planning and aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction.
- BRM is applicable when skin envelope preservation is oncologically safe and implant-based reconstruction is planned.

## Abstract

Background: Macromastia is a well-known issue in breast reconstruction. Skin-reducing mastectomy (SRM) was introduced as a skin-sparing mastectomy that utilizes a skin reduction pattern similar to breast reduction or breast lift surgery, specifically to manage hypertrophic and pendulous breasts. Over time, numerous authors have contributed to refining the SRM technique, leading to the development of various technical variants. However, the diversity of approaches inspired by SRM has created confusion, and clear surgical indications are lacking. Methods: We propose a unifying concept called breast reshaping mastectomy (BRM), which encompasses all techniques based on SRM principles. The BRM aims not only to preserve and reduce the breast skin envelope but also to immediately reshape it for a more aesthetic outcome. This approach is applicable to all mastectomies where skin envelope preservation (with or without the nipple-areola complex) is oncologically safe, a modification of breast skin coverage is needed for better aesthetic results, and an implant-based reconstruction is planned. Results: To define the BRM concept, we reviewed the existing literature on SRM and its related techniques. Our analysis focused on four key elements: skin incision pattern, implant coverage strategy, nipple-areola complex (NAC) management, and the choice between two-stage and direct-to-implant reconstruction. Conclusions: By integrating these four components into a single surgical framework, BRM provides a structured approach to breast reconstruction that enhances both oncologic safety and aesthetic outcomes. Standardizing these techniques could help clarify surgical indications and improve reconstructive planning for patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy.