This paper is marked retracted in the scholarly record (OpenAlex). Interpret its findings with caution.
RETRACTED: Ma et al. MiR-122 Induces Radiosensitization in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Line. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 22137–22150
Debin Ma, Hui Jia, Mengmeng Qin, Wenjie Dai, Tao Wang, Erguang Liang, Guofu Dong, Zuojun Wang, Zhiyuan Zhang, Fan Feng
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations · RNA modifications and cancer · Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
The Journal retracts the article “MiR-122 Induces Radiosensitization in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Line” [1].
Following publication, concerns were brought to the attention of the Editorial Office regarding a potential duplication of figures in this paper [1].
Adhering to our procedure, an investigation was conducted by the Editorial Office and the Editorial Board that confirmed the duplication of two panels within Figure 2a listing different experimental time points.
While the authors fully cooperated with the Editorial Office during the investigation, they were unable to satisfactorily explain the overlap of these figures, nor could they meet the required quality standards of raw images in order to consider a correction as per the journal original image requirements policy (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/instructions#oriimages). As a result, the Editorial Board and Editor-in-Chief were unable to confirm the reliability of the findings and subsequently decided to retract this paper this publication [1], as per MDPI’s retraction policy (https://www.mdpi.com/ethics#_bookmark30).
This retraction was approved by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Int. J. Mol. Sci.
The authors did not provide a comment on this decision.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.