# Australian Clinicians’ Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivations in Implementing Exposure and Response Prevention for Youth with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Exploratory Study

## TL;DR

This study explores how Australian mental health clinicians implement a specific therapy for youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder, finding that experienced clinicians are more capable and motivated.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the factors influencing clinicians' implementation of ERP for youth with OCD in Australia.

## Key findings

- Experienced clinicians showed greater knowledge, adherence, and confidence in ERP compared to typical clinicians.
- Experienced clinicians intended to spend more time on within-session ERP for youth.
- There was no significant difference in intended time for between-session ERP between clinician groups.

## Abstract

Objectives: Informed by implementation science, this exploratory study examined the capabilities, opportunities, and motivations of Australian mental health clinicians (N = 38) associated with the implementation of exposure and response prevention (ERP) for youth (i.e., children and adolescents) with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It also explored how the capabilities and motivations of mental health clinicians untrained in ERP for youth (i.e., typical clinicians; n = 25) differed from clinicians experienced in the use of ERP for youth (i.e., experienced clinicians; n = 13). Methods: Questionnaires were administered to the entire sample alongside observational role-plays, which assessed observed adherence and competence delivering ERP against published best-practice standards among available participants. Results: In the whole sample, the reported time dedicated to implementing ERP was associated with a range of factors relating to capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to implement ERP. Experienced clinicians had greater knowledge, adherence, competence, and self-reported confidence using ERP and fewer negative beliefs about ERP relative to typical clinicians. They also intended to dedicate greater time to implementing within-session ERP for youth and reported greater within- and between-session time spent doing so compared to typical clinicians. The time intended to dedicate to implementing between-sessions ERP did not significantly differ between the clinician groups. Conclusions: In summary, compared to typical clinicians, experienced clinicians appeared to possess greater levels of capabilities and motivations to implement ERP for youth with OCD. Future research examining barriers and facilitators of ERP implementation in community settings and identifying effective strategies to improve it would benefit service provision and, ultimately, outcomes for youth.