# Antibacterial Efficacy of Benefect™ Botanical Disinfectant in Comparison with Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorohexidine Against Multiple Endodontic Pathogens: An Ex Vivo Study

**Authors:** Sarmed Toma, Joseph Ferracciolo, Mazin Askar, Eric Krukonis, Susan Paurazas

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/dj13020087 · Dentistry Journal · 2025-02-18

## TL;DR

This study compares the antibacterial effectiveness of a botanical disinfectant to sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against endodontic pathogens in human teeth.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that a botanical disinfectant has comparable antibacterial efficacy to traditional agents in endodontic disinfection.

## Key findings

- Benefect™ achieved >99.9% killing of S. mutans, similar to NaOCl and CHX.
- All tested irrigants showed at least 99% antibacterial activity against E. faecalis, A. naeslundii, and P. gingivalis.
- No statistically significant differences were found between the three antimicrobial treatments.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Natural antibacterial agents, such as essential oils, can potentially be used for endodontic disinfection with less toxicity than other available irrigants such as sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX). BenefectTM is a formulation of essential oils with broad antibacterial spectrum efficacy. This study aims to compare the antibacterial efficacy of BenefectTM to 6% NaOCl and 2% CHX irrigant solutions against multiple endodontic pathogens. Methods: The study utilized 100 extracted human single-canal permanent teeth. Samples were decoronated, instrumented, and autoclaved. The teeth were infected with Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces naeslundii, or Porphyromonas gingivalis for 6–24 h. The teeth were divided into four groups according to the irrigant solution used. Contact with each irrigant was maintained for 12 min. The antibacterial efficacy of each treatment was calculated relative to viable bacteria recovered after saline treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. Results: All S. mutans samples treated with NaOCl, CHX, and BenefectTM showed a complete absence of bacterial colonies when compared to saline (>99.9% killing). The E. faecalis, A. naeslundii, and P. gingivalis samples treated with all tested irrigants showed at least 99% antibacterial killing activity. There was no statistical difference in killing between these three antimicrobial treatments. Conclusions: BenefectTM botanical disinfectant has comparable antibacterial efficacy to NaOCl and CHX against S. mutans, E. faecalis, A. naeslundii, and P. gingivalis.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** sodium hypochlorite (PubChem CID 23665760), chlorhexidine (PubChem CID 9552079)
- **Species:** Streptococcus mutans (taxon 1309), Enterococcus faecalis (taxon 1351), Actinomyces naeslundii (taxon 1655), Porphyromonas gingivalis (taxon 837)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** toxicity (MESH:D064420), Endodontic Pathogens (MESH:D011671)
- **Species:** Porphyromonas gingivalis (species) [taxon 837], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Streptococcus mutans (species) [taxon 1309], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Enterococcus faecalis (species) [taxon 1351], Actinomyces naeslundii (species) [taxon 1655]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11854286/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11854286/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11854286/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11854286