# Treatments and Outcomes in Neuroendocrine Patients Treated with Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogues: An Italian Real-World Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

## TL;DR

This study compares the effectiveness of two somatostatin analogues in treating neuroendocrine tumors in real-world clinical settings in Italy.

## Contribution

A real-world propensity score-matched analysis of first-line somatostatin analogues in neuroendocrine tumor patients reveals treatment patterns and outcomes.

## Key findings

- Lanreotide and octreotide showed similar progression-free and overall survival in neuroendocrine tumor patients.
- Octreotide had a 36% higher likelihood of progressing to second-line treatment compared to lanreotide.
- Multiple metastases and high Ki-67 levels were strongly associated with worse progression-free survival.

## Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment patterns and outcomes in two propensity score-matched cohorts of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) treated with first-line somatostatin analogue (SSA). Methods: Metastatic NET patients treated with first-line SSA (2009–2022) were retrospectively examined. First-line lanreotide vs. octreotide cohorts were matched 1:1 by propensity scores for demographics, tumour characteristics, and diagnosis year. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Among 441 patients, 310 were matched (155 in both the octreotide and lanreotide groups). First-line SSA was monotherapy (63.5%) or combination with other medications (36.5%). A total of 77% of second-line patients (188/244) maintained their initial SSA medication in combination with other therapies. Radioligand therapy with lanreotide (N = 72; 29.5%) or octreotide (N = 70; 28.7%) was the most common second-line treatment. First-line lanreotide and octreotide cohorts had similar median PFS (15.5; 95% CI: 13.6–19.1 vs. 14.0; 95% CI: 12.0–15.8 months), despite octreotide having a 36% higher likelihood of moving to the second line than lanreotide (95% CI: 1.05–1.76, p = 0.018). Multiple metastases (HR = 1.45; p = 0.004, 95% CI: 1.13–1.87) and Ki-67 > 20% (HR = 2.34; p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.43–3.83) were significantly associated with the worst PFS. First-line lanreotide patients had a median OS of 10.4 years (95% CI: 7.5-NA) and octreotide 9.2 years (95% CI: 7.3-NA) (p = 0.537). Bone metastases increased death risk by 91% (p = 0.014; 95% CI: 1.14–3.20). Conclusions: SSA monotherapy is the main first-line treatment and most subsequent treatments include SSA with additional medications. Cohorts had similar PFS/OS, but octreotide demonstrated a 36% significantly higher likelihood of moving to the second-line treatment.