mSphere of Influence: Lighting up organellar communication in protozoan parasites
Diego Huet

TL;DR
This article discusses how a new labeling technique helped study communication between cell parts in a parasite called Toxoplasma gondii.
Contribution
The paper highlights the novel application of turboID for proximity labeling in studying organellar interactions in T. gondii.
Findings
TurboID enabled efficient proximity labeling in T. gondii for studying organellar communication.
The technique improved strategies to dissect inter-organellar interactions in the parasite.
Abstract
Diego Huet works in molecular parasitology, focusing on the organellar biology of Toxoplasma gondii. In this mSphere of Influence article, he reflects on how the article “Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with turboID” (Branon et al., 2018) impacted his research and the strategies used to dissect inter-organellar interactions in T. gondii.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiotin and Related Studies · Click Chemistry and Applications · Cellular transport and secretion
COMMENTARY
Within the eukaryotic cell, effective communication between organelles is crucial for carrying out essential cellular processes. It is now well established that organelles interact with each other via membrane contact sites (MCSs) in addition to vesicular trafficking or cytoplasmic diffusion (1). Although inter-organellar communication is a ubiquitous phenomenon across eukaryotic cells, the functional significance and molecular composition of MCSs have only been extensively characterized in yeast, plants, and mammals. These three groups constitute only a small fraction of eukaryotic diversity, so what about the rest? What about protists, which encompass the majority of this diversity? The study of MCSs in protists—many of which harbor phylum-specific organelles—is in its nascent stages (2–4), and my laboratory is actively studying them in Toxoplasma gondii, a parasitic protist.
How does one investigate MCSs? Proximity biotinylation is a technique that has advanced our understanding of these structures—albeit only in a handful of organisms as I mentioned before. It is based on the use of a promiscuous biotin ligase to label proteins in a proximity-dependent manner upon biotin addition (5). Labeled proteins can subsequently be isolated via immunoprecipitation using streptavidin beads and subjected to mass spectrometry analysis. Additionally, proximity biotinylation does not require any pre-existing knowledge of the MCS composition, a benefit when you study T. gondii or any non-conventional model organism where the vast majority of the protein-coding genes remain uncharacterized. When thinking about ways to study MCSs in T. gondii, I stumbled upon the article by Branon and colleagues (6). Branon et al. used directed evolution to generate TurboID, a new version of the promiscuous biotin ligase BirA. TurboID biotinylated other proteins much faster than the original BirA, taking only 10 min compared with 18 h. Importantly, Branon et al. demonstrated the feasibility of using TurboID to rapidly label different cellular compartments, including the mitochondrial matrix and the cytosolic face of the endoplasmic reticulum. They used an elegant mass spectrometry-based analysis approach to demonstrate that TurboID can robustly label a substantial portion of the known mitochondrial (67%) and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (87%) human proteomes. To make their analysis more stringent, they also used a spatial reference control by targeting TurboID to the cytosol. By comparing the proteins labeled by TurboID when it was targeted to an organelle with those labeled when in the cytosol, Branon et al. were able to determine which proteins were specifically associated with a particular organelle.
To summarize, proximity biotinylation using TurboID, and a recent, novel iteration called Split-TurboID, represent a powerful tool for investigating MCSs. Despite the low expression and a potential dynamic localization—including stimulus-dependent recruitment—of many proteins in these microdomains, the use of controls, such as a spatial reference and the subsequent validation of potential candidates, has enabled the identification of novel MCS proteins in mammals (7, 8). Proximity biotinylation has significantly helped my group to develop a strategy to investigate MCSs in T. gondii using an unbiased proteomic approach. We have been able to target TurboID to the cytosolic surfaces of the mitochondrion (T. gondii has a single mitochondrion), apicoplast (a plant-like organelle only found in T. gondii and its relatives), and endoplasmic reticulum. Combined with a spatial reference control (cytosolic TurboID), we are hopeful that the approach developed by Branon and colleagues, which has also been subsequently refined and published as a protocol (9), will help us determine the composition of MCSs in T. gondii and provide novel insights into organisms beyond conventional biological models.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Scorrano L, De Matteis MA, Emr S, Giordano F, Hajnóczky G, Kornmann B, Lackner LL, Levine TP, Pellegrini L, Reinisch K, Rizzuto R, Simmen T, Stenmark H, Ungermann C, Schuldiner M. 2019. Coming together to define membrane contact sites. Nat Commun 10:1287. doi:10.1038/s 41467-019-09253-330894536 PMC 6427007 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Santos HJ, Nozaki T. 2021. Interorganellar communication and membrane contact sites in protozoan parasites. Parasitol Int 83:102372. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2021.10237233933652 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Ovciarikova J, Oliveira Souza RO, Arrizabalaga G, Sheiner L. 2022. Protein control of membrane and organelle dynamics: insights from the divergent eukaryote Toxoplasma gondii. Curr Opin Cell Biol 76:102085. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2022.10208535569259 PMC 9586877 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Huet D, Moreno SNJ. 2023. Interorganellar communication through membrane contact sites in Toxoplasma gondii. Contact (Thousand Oaks) 6. doi:10.1177/25152564231189064 PMC 1040835337560622 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Roux KJ, Kim DI, Raida M, Burke B. 2012. A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 196:801–810. doi:10.1083/jcb.20111209822412018 PMC 3308701 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Branon TC, Bosch JA, Sanchez AD, Udeshi ND, Svinkina T, Carr SA, Feldman JL, Perrimon N, Ting AY. 2018. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with Turbo ID. Nat Biotechnol 36:880–887. doi:10.1038/nbt.420130125270 PMC 6126969 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Cho KF, Branon TC, Rajeev S, Svinkina T, Udeshi ND, Thoudam T, Kwak C, Rhee H-W, Lee I-K, Carr SA, Ting AY. 2020. Split-Turbo ID enables contact-dependent proximity labeling in cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:12143–12154. doi:10.1073/pnas.191952811732424107 PMC 7275672 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Nguyen TT, Voeltz GK. 2022. An ER phospholipid hydrolase drives ER-associated mitochondrial constriction for fission and fusion. Elife 11:e 84279. doi:10.7554/e Life.8427936448541 PMC 9725753 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
