A Precision Medicine Model for Targeted Antibiotic Therapy in Urinary Tract Infections: A Valuable Tool to Reduce Hospitalization Stay and the Time to Switch to Oral Treatment

TL;DR

This study shows that using a precision medicine model for treating urinary tract infections can shorten hospital stays and reduce the time to switch to oral antibiotics.

Contribution

The study demonstrates that a precision medicine model improves UTI management by reducing hospitalization and antimicrobial adjustments.

Findings

Patients in the precision medicine group had shorter hospital stays (5 days vs. 8 days).

The time to switch to oral treatment was reduced in the precision medicine group (72 h vs. 96 h).

Fewer patients in the precision medicine group needed to change antimicrobial therapy during hospitalization.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The management of urinary tract infections (UTIs) has become an increasingly challenging medical intervention. This study explores whether adoption of a precision medicine model could improve the management of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis (uAPN) or complicated UTIs (cUTIs) compared with the standard of care approach, in hospitalized patients. Methods: From January 2022 to March 2024, all patients affected by uAPN or cUTIs and attending our urological institution were randomized to receive the following: antibiotic treatment according to guidelines and recommendations (standard of care group) or antibiotic treatment according to the precision medical model (intervention group). The main outcome measures were the rates of clinical success and the length of hospitalization. The time until switching to oral treatment was regarded as a secondary outcome measure. Results: Eighty-three patients were enrolled in the standard of care group, while seventy-nine patients were enrolled in the intervention group. While the overall clinical success rate was similar in the two groups (75 vs. 72; p = 0.97), a statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of length of hospitalization (8 days vs. 5 days; p = 0.03) and time to switch to oral treatment (96 h vs. 72 h; p = 0.04). A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the need to change antimicrobial therapy during hospitalization [12 out of 80 vs. 6 out of 77; p = 0.04]. Conclusions: Adoption of the precision medicine model appears as a valuable means to improve the management of patients with uAPN and cUTIs. By reducing the period of hospitalization and the time to switch to oral treatment, the precision medicine model also improves antimicrobial stewardship in the management of UTIs.

Figures