The ingredients of a great scientific lecture
David R Smith

TL;DR
This paper discusses the need for improving scientific lectures to make them more engaging and easier to understand.
Contribution
The paper highlights the importance of better presentation techniques in scientific communication.
Findings
Scientific lectures are often criticized for being dense and hard to understand.
There is a need to improve how data is presented to make it more accessible.
Abstract
Scientific lectures are often dense, boring, and hard to understand. We need to do better at presenting our data in an accessible and engaging manner.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConferences and Exhibitions Management
