“Common sense is hard work” but benefits from persistent collaboration: Lessons learnt from the development of The Collaborative Network for European Clinical Trials for Children (c4c) to support the conduct of paediatric clinical trials of medicines
Sabah Attar, Carla Peacock, Mandy Wan, Erin Halil, Chloe Bickerstaff, Lionel Tan, Hafsah Bhatti, Ricardo M. Fernandes, Regis Hankard, Mark A. Turner

TL;DR
This paper shares lessons learned from building a European network to support pediatric clinical trials, emphasizing collaboration and communication.
Contribution
The paper provides categorized lessons from setting up academic and industry pediatric trials in a public-private partnership.
Findings
12 trials were supported through national and European coordination.
9 CDA cycles resulted in 436 site CDAs signed in a median of 8.11 days.
Persistent collaboration reduces repeated work and improves trial efficiency.
Abstract
The Collaborative Network for European Clinical Trials for Children (c4c) is a public private partnership with a developed infrastructure across European sites to support the design and conduct of multi-national academic and industry paediatric clinical trials. This paper aims to review the learning points identified during co-development of c4c processes by academic and industry partners. Study metrics were recorded. Learning points were captured during network development, categorized and included in a thematic analysis from which lessons learnt were identified. 12 trials were supported by sites coordinated at national level and integrated at European level. A total of 9 CDA cycles were completed, resulting in 436 site CDAs signed in a median of 8.11 days. Lessons learnt included the importance of: relationship building by early engagement with partners; reducing misunderstanding by…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPharmaceutical studies and practices · Ethics in Clinical Research · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
