# Evaluation of In Vivo Efficacy and In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Fluoride-Releasing Orthodontic Composite and Fluoride Varnish

**Authors:** Naman Mittal, Rajat Mangla, Deepankar Bhatnagar, Mandeep K Bhullar, Gaurav Ahuja, Arti Devi

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77823 · Cureus · 2025-01-22

## TL;DR

This study compares the effectiveness of fluoride-releasing orthodontic materials in preventing plaque, gum issues, and tooth demineralization in patients.

## Contribution

The study evaluates both in vivo clinical outcomes and in vitro mechanical properties of two fluoride-based orthodontic treatments.

## Key findings

- Fluoride varnish and composite significantly reduced plaque and improved gum health compared to controls.
- In vitro tests showed higher shear bond strength for the fluoride varnish group compared to other groups.
- Demineralization levels did not show significant differences across the groups in vivo.

## Abstract

Introduction: The fluoride varnish and fluoride-releasing composites are being used in orthodontic patients to prevent white spot lesions (WSL). The study evaluates and compares the efficacy of these two on plaque accumulation, gingival health, and demineralization in vivo, as well as shear bond strength in vitro.

Methods: This study was conducted using 45 extracted premolars for the in vitro group and 45 patients for the in vivo group. Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups of 15 each. In the in vitro subgroups, bonding in Subgroup I (control group) was done using Transbond XT, Subgroup II (fluoride varnish group) involved the application of fluoride varnish using Fluor Protector, and Subgroup III (Transbond Plus Color Change Adhesive) was used for bonding. Shear bond strength was evaluated in the in vitro group using a universal testing machine. In the three in vivo subgroups, bonding was done similarly to the in vitro group. The efficacy was assessed in vivo using the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and demineralization index at T0 (baseline), T1 (week 4), T2 (week 8), and T3 (week 12).

Results: The results demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the inter- and intragroup comparisons of the PI and GI, whereas the demineralization index group did not show any statistically significant difference, as indicated by ANOVA, Tukey’s test, and paired t-tests. The in vitro group showed statistically significant differences between the fluoride varnish group and both the control group and the fluoridated composite group.

Conclusion: Fluoride-releasing orthodontic composite and fluoridated varnish can be used to prevent plaque accumulation and demineralization and maintain gingival health during fixed orthodontic therapy.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** fluoride (PubChem CID 28179)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** WSL (MESH:D003731)
- **Chemicals:** Fluor Protector (MESH:C022599), Fluoride (MESH:D005459), Transbond XT (MESH:C477790), Composite (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11843807/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11843807/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11843807