# Developing a brief older adults' physical activity questionnaire

**Authors:** Koutatsu Nagai, Ryota Matsuzawa, Hiroyuki Sasai, Kayoko Tamaki, Hiroshi Kusunoki, Yosuke Wada, Shotaro Tsuji, Kana Hashimoto, Takara Mori, Ken Shinmura

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14986 · Geriatrics & Gerontology International · 2024-09-30

## TL;DR

Researchers created a short questionnaire to quickly assess physical activity in older adults, finding it reliable and somewhat valid compared to other methods.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is the development and evaluation of the Brief Older Adults' Physical Activity Questionnaire (BOPAQ) for assessing MVPA in older adults.

## Key findings

- The BOPAQ showed good test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78.
- The BOPAQ correlated moderately with accelerometer-based MVPA (rho = 0.297), but not strongly with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (rho = 0.139).
- Bland–Altman plots revealed an underestimation bias of 51.72 minutes per week in the BOPAQ measurements.

## Abstract

This study aimed to develop and evaluate the Brief Older Adults' Physical Activity Questionnaire (BOPAQ), which was designed to quickly assess moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in community‐dwelling older adults.

We used a cross‐sectional study design involving 165 older participants. The BOPAQ calculated weekly MVPA duration based on two questions regarding the number of days per week engaged in MVPA and the daily duration of activity. Validity was assessed by correlating the MVPA durations derived from the BOPAQ with those obtained from the ActiGraph and International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form. Reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and measurement errors were analyzed using Bland–Altman plots.

The BOPAQ reasonably correlated with accelerometer‐based MVPA (rho = 0.297) and showed good test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78, 95% CI 0.64–0.87). In contrast, the correlation between the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form and accelerometer‐based MVPA was poor (rho = 0.139). The cut‐off value for the BOPAQ was set to identify participants engaging in <150 min of objectively measured physical activity per week, corresponding to the 150‐min threshold. However, the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic analyses was not significantly high (0.601, 95% CI 0.514–0.688). The Bland–Altman plots showed an underestimation bias of 51.72 min/week (95% CI 1.61–101.84) and showed heteroscedasticity.

Despite some measurement errors, the BOPAQ is an available tool for assessing MVPA in community‐dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1150–1155.

We developed the Brief Older Adults' Physical Activity Questionnaire, designed to quickly assess moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity in community‐dwelling older adults. The Brief Older Adults' Physical Activity Questionnaire showed good reliability and acceptable validity, indicating that it is a useful tool for assessing physical activity in this population.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cognitive impairment (MESH:D003072), Frail Elderly (MESH:D000073496), cardiovascular or pulmonary disease (MESH:D002318), breathlessness (MESH:D004417), PA (MESH:D059445)
- **Chemicals:** BOPAQ (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11843522/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11843522/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11843522/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11843522