Cold snaring vs. standard forceps biopsy in sampling colorectal cancer: a comparative case report

Abstract

Figures

Comparison of histopathological features. a–c Forceps biopsy. d–f Cold snare biopsy.

Full text

An accurate histological diagnosis of colorectal cancer is essential for promptly establishing appropriate therapeutic management. Furthermore, nowadays larger samples are needed to evaluate immunological and genetic panels. For malignant lesions that cannot be removed endoscopically, the European Guidelines recommend taking six carefully targeted biopsies from the suspected cancer focus 1 . Despite advancements in endoscopic imaging, a retrospective study of 962 patients undergoing colorectal adenocarcinoma resection found that 29% (62/217) required repeat endoscopy due to sampling errors 2 , leading to a 1.36-fold increase in time to surgery (95% CI 1.20–1.54, p<0.001) and higher healthcare costs. Choi et al. found that positive diagnosis rates for the first, second, and third biopsy specimens of advanced colorectal cancer were 78.1%, 87.5%, and 93.8%, respectively, with no significant increase from additional biopsies 3 . Reducing biopsy numbers by increasing targeted tissue sample size through cold snaring could enhance diagnostic sensitivity, minimize repeat procedures, and reduce pathologist workload.

We report a case of a 58-year-old patient who underwent a colonoscopy that revealed a 5-cm macronodular lesion proximal to the hepatic flexure ( Video 1 ). The lesion was thoroughly evaluated using white light imaging, narrow band imaging, and underwater magnification. The major 15-mm nodule was characterized by a pit pattern VN (Kudo classification), suggesting invasive cancer.

Procedure comparing cold snare biopsy with standard forceps biopsy in sampling colorectal cancer.Video 1

The lesion was considered non-removable endoscopically. Biopsies were performed, six with forceps and one with cold snaring. The six biopsies with forcepss were stored in formalin in one container, while the snare biopsy was placed in a separate container. Pathologists conducted a blind analysis.

Histological examination of the cold snare biopsy revealed focal areas with glandular fusion, papillary structures, and necrotic foci, affirming adenocarcinoma developed within a tubulovillous adenoma with high grade intra-epithelial neoplasia ( Fig. 1 ). In contrast, forceps biopsies showed only high grade intraepithelial neoplasia due to fragmentation and superficiality, without evidence of adenocarcinoma.

Comparison of histopathological features. a–c Forceps biopsy. d–f Cold snare biopsy.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AC