This paper is marked retracted in the scholarly record (OpenAlex). Interpret its findings with caution.
Retraction: In situ fabrication of lanthanum-doped nickel oxide nanostructures using sol–gel for the degradation of rhodamine B
Furqan Ali, Asma Nazir, Zeshan Ali Sandhu, Arslan Mehmood, Muhammad Asam Raza, Muhammad Hamayun, Abdullah G. Al-Sehemi

TL;DR
This retraction notice addresses a previously published study on creating lanthanum-doped nickel oxide nanostructures for degrading rhodamine B.
Contribution
The paper does not contribute new findings; it retracts a prior publication.
Findings
The original study's findings are being retracted.
No new scientific results are presented in this retraction notice.
Abstract
Retraction of ‘In situ fabrication of lanthanum-doped nickel oxide nanostructures using sol–gel for the degradation of rhodamine B’ by Furqan Ali et al., RSC Adv., 2024, 14, 4406–4415, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA08311J.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —King Khalid University10.13039/501100007446
- —Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University10.13039/501100023674
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
The Royal Society of Chemistry hereby wholly retracts this RSC Advances article due to concerns with the reliability of the data.
There are duplications within the SEM images in Fig. 4 (panels a & c and b & d), there are concerns with the labelling of the EDS spectra in Fig. 5, the XRD patterns in Fig. 6 have unusual similarity between the traces for 3% and 2% La doped NiO, and the UV-vis absorbance spectra in Fig. 7a have unusual peak shapes. The authors have admitted a mistake in the EDS and requested a correction for Fig. 4 and 5 but the raw data supplied by the authors for Fig. 6 and 7 show signs of manipulation.
Given the significance of these concerns, the Editor has lost confidence that the findings presented in this paper are reliable.
The authors were informed but have not indicated whether they agree with the decision to retract.
Signed: Laura Fisher, Executive Editor, RSC Advances
Date: 11th February 2025
