# California annual grass phenology and allometry influence ecosystem dynamics and fire regime in a vegetation demography model

**Authors:** Xiulin Gao, Charles D. Koven, Marcos Longo, Zachary Robbins, Polly Thornton, Alex Hall, Samuel Levis, Stefan Rahimi, Chonggang Xu, Lara M. Kueppers

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/nph.20421 · The New Phytologist · 2025-01-30

## TL;DR

This study shows how grass growth patterns and structure affect fire and ecosystem dynamics in California grasslands, improving Earth system models.

## Contribution

The study identifies grass allometry and phenology as key drivers of grassland dynamics and fire regimes in Earth system models.

## Key findings

- Grass allometry and plant phenology strongly influence seasonal ecosystem dynamics and fire regimes in California annual grasslands.
- Canopy architecture affects grassland structure and function more than carbon partitioning strategies.
- Variation in grassland productivity drives regional differences in annual burned area.

## Abstract

Grass‐dominated ecosystems cover wide areas of the land surface yet have received far less attention from the Earth System Model (ESM) community. This limits model projections of ecosystem dynamics in response to global change and coupled vegetation–climate dynamics.We used the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES), a dynamic vegetation demography model, to determine ecosystem sensitivity to alternate, observed grass allometries and biophysical traits, and evaluated model performance in capturing California C3 annual grasslands structure and fire regimes.Grass allometry, leaf physiology, plant phenology, and plant mortality all drove the seasonal variation in matter and energy exchange and fire dynamics in California annual grasslands. Allometry influenced grassland structure and function mainly through canopy architecture‐mediated space and light competition instead of through carbon partitioning strategy. Regional variation in grassland annual burned area was driven by variation in ecosystem productivity.Our study advances the modeling of grassy ecosystems in ESMs by establishing the importance of grass allometry and plant phenology and mortality in driving C3 annual grassland seasonal dynamics and fire regime. The calibrated annual grass allometry and biophysical traits presented can be applied in future studies to project climate–vegetation–fire feedbacks in annual grass‐dominant ecosystems under global change.

Grass‐dominated ecosystems cover wide areas of the land surface yet have received far less attention from the Earth System Model (ESM) community. This limits model projections of ecosystem dynamics in response to global change and coupled vegetation–climate dynamics.

We used the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES), a dynamic vegetation demography model, to determine ecosystem sensitivity to alternate, observed grass allometries and biophysical traits, and evaluated model performance in capturing California C3 annual grasslands structure and fire regimes.

Grass allometry, leaf physiology, plant phenology, and plant mortality all drove the seasonal variation in matter and energy exchange and fire dynamics in California annual grasslands. Allometry influenced grassland structure and function mainly through canopy architecture‐mediated space and light competition instead of through carbon partitioning strategy. Regional variation in grassland annual burned area was driven by variation in ecosystem productivity.

Our study advances the modeling of grassy ecosystems in ESMs by establishing the importance of grass allometry and plant phenology and mortality in driving C3 annual grassland seasonal dynamics and fire regime. The calibrated annual grass allometry and biophysical traits presented can be applied in future studies to project climate–vegetation–fire feedbacks in annual grass‐dominant ecosystems under global change.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** fire (MESH:D000092422)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11840405/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11840405/full.md

## References

91 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11840405/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11840405