# Simplified Visual Stimuli Impair Retrieval and Transfer in Audiovisual Equivalence Learning Tasks

**Authors:** Kálmán Tót, Gabriella Eördegh, Noémi Harcsa‐Pintér, Balázs Bodosi, Szabolcs Kéri, Ádám Kiss, András Kelemen, Gábor Braunitzer, Attila Nagy

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70339 · Brain and Behavior · 2025-02-19

## TL;DR

This study shows that using simple geometric shapes as visual stimuli makes it harder to retrieve and transfer audiovisual information, even though learning is unaffected.

## Contribution

The study reveals that simplified, less verbalizable visual stimuli impair retrieval and generalization in audiovisual learning tasks.

## Key findings

- No significant differences were found in acquisition between visual and audiovisual tests.
- Audiovisual tests showed significantly poorer performance and longer reaction times in retrieval and generalization.
- Simplified visual stimuli hinder the retrieval and transfer of audiovisual information.

## Abstract

The visually guided Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test (RAET) and the various visual and audiovisual versions of the test with the same structure involve rule acquisition, retrieval, and generalization and is based on learning stimulus pairs (antecedents and consequents). In an earlier study we have found no difference in the acquisition learning and only slight enhancement in retrieval and generalization in the audiovisual learning compared to the visual one if complex readily verbalizable visual stimuli (cartoon faces and color fish) were used. In this study, we sought to examine whether similar phenomena can be observed with feature‐restricted, less verbalizable visual stimuli (geometric shapes).

A total of 119 healthy adult volunteers completed two computer‐based test paradigms: Polygon (PO) and SoundPolygon (SP). PO is a visual test where the antecedents are shaded circles, and the consequents are geometric shapes. SP is an audiovisual test where the antecedents are sounds and the consequents are the same geometric shapes as in PO.

There were no significant differences in the performances and the reaction times in the acquisition phase between the PO (visual) and SP (audiovisual) tests. However, the performances in retrieval and generalization were significantly poorer in the audiovisual test and the reaction times were also longer.

The acquisition phase seems to be independent from the stimulus modality if the simple geometric shapes were visual stimuli. However, feature‐restricted, less verbalizable visual stimuli make more difficult to retrieve and generalize the already acquired audiovisual information.

The study examined how simplified visual stimuli affect learning, retrieval, and generalization (transfer) in visual and audiovisual acquired equivalence tests. No differences were found in acquisition between the two tests, but retrieval and generalization were significantly poorer in the audiovisual test. These suggest that simple, less verbalizable visual stimuli make it harder to retrieve and transfer audiovisual information.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Impair (MESH:D060825)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11839764/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11839764/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11839764/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11839764