Are technical performance differences in wheelchair fencing linked to disability categories?

TL;DR

This study found that wheelchair fencers in disability categories A and B show differences in muscle activity and reaction time, which could improve classification and training strategies.

Contribution

The study identifies distinct neuromuscular profiles between wheelchair fencing disability categories A and B.

Findings

Category A fencers had lower reaction times and higher muscle tension than category B fencers.

Significant differences were found in the left latissimus dorsi and deltoid muscle activity between the groups.

Back and abdominal muscles play a key role in stabilizing posture during wheelchair fencing.

Abstract

This study aimed to examine differences in muscle activity and activation timing in wheelchair fencers across disability categories A and B to better understand the neuromuscular dynamics involved in their performance.

Sixteen right-handed wheelchair fencers from the Polish National Paralympic Team, grouped into categories A and B, participated in the study. Muscle activity and activation timing (reaction time) were recorded during a visual-cue task using a surface electromyography system and a 3D accelerometer. Eight upper body muscles, including the deltoid, triceps, biceps, forearm extensors/flexors, latissimus dorsi, and obliques, were assessed. Data were processed using MyoResearch and MATLAB, and statistical analyses utilized the Wald-Wolfowitz runs test.

Intergroup differences in reaction time and muscle activity were found: category A fencers tended to achieve lower reaction times and higher muscle bioelectric tension values than category B fencers. Significant differences between the groups were found in the activity of the left latissimus dorsi and the deltoid muscles (p < 0.05).

The study indicates the important role of the back and abdominal muscles as stabilizing postural muscles in wheelchair fencing. The significant differences in muscle activity for the back and deltoid muscles suggest distinct neuromuscular profiles between disability categories A and B. These findings could enhance classification accuracy and inform training strategies for para-athletes, optimizing performance and targeting specific muscle groups for improvement.

Figures