Correction: Evaluating Bard Gemini Pro and GPT-4 Vision Against Student Performance in Medical Visual Question Answering: Comparative Case Study
Jonas Roos, Ron Martin, Robert Kaczmarczyk
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
In “Evaluating Bard Gemini Pro and GPT-4 Vision Against Student Performance in Medical Visual Question Answering: Comparative Case Study” (JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e57592) the authors noted two errors.
MultimediaAppendices 12 contained identical files. Therefore, the Multimedia Appendix 1 file has been changed to the correct supplementary inference code.
Additionally, the “query” column of Multimedia Appendix 2 has been removed.
The corrections will appear in the online version of the paper on the JMIR Publications website on February 11, 2025, together with the publication of this correction notice. Because this was made after submission to PubMed, PubMed Central, and other full-text repositories, the corrected article has also been resubmitted to those repositories.
Supplementary material
10.2196/71664Multimedia Appendix 1Inference code.
10.2196/71664Multimedia Appendix 2Responses from the models.