The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on forensic pathology services in Limpopo province, South Africa
Thakadu A. Mamashela, Samuel T. Ntuli

TL;DR
The study shows how the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted forensic pathology services in rural South Africa, leading to fewer cases and changes in procedures.
Contribution
This study provides the first detailed analysis of how the pandemic affected forensic pathology services in a rural South African province.
Findings
There was an 8.1% decrease in post-mortem cases during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period.
Natural deaths increased while unnatural deaths and forensic referrals decreased significantly.
Most facilities reported fewer autopsies, except for one facility.
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the preventative measures taken, especially how they affect forensic pathology services in rural South Africa. This retrospective analysis includes referred post-mortem cases from all forensic pathology services in Limpopo province, comparing the period before the COVID-19 pandemic (01 January 2019 to 31 December 2019) with the pandemic period (01 January 2020 to 31 December 2020). Data analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 software (StataCorp; College Station, TX). Chi-square test was employed for comparison, with a p-value < 0.05 deemed statistically significant. Approximately 9319 cases were submitted for post-mortem examinations, with 4857 occurring before the pandemic and 4462 during it, marking an 8.1% decrease. There was a decrease in the number of unnatural death cases, while the instances of natural deaths…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Variables | 2019 ( | 2020 ( | % Change (2019 vs. 2020) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |||
| Natural deaths | 395 | 8.1 | 408 | 9.1 | 3.3 | 0.082 |
| Unnatural deaths | 4106 | 84.5 | 3666 | 82.2 | −10.7 | 0.002 |
| Undetermined | 190 | 3.9 | 163 | 3.7 | −14.2 | 0.513 |
| Under investigations | 166 | 3.5 | 225 | 5.0 | 35.5 | < 0.001 |
|
| ||||||
| A | 1848 | 38.0 | 1774 | 39.7 | −4.0 | 0.091 |
| B | 834 | 17.2 | 721 | 16.2 | −13.5 | 0.190 |
| C | 801 | 16.5 | 716 | 16.0 | −10.6 | 0.561 |
| D | 542 | 11.2 | 480 | 10.8 | −11.4 | 0.535 |
| E | 832 | 17.1 | 771 | 17.3 | −7.3 | 0.849 |
| District | Facility | 2019 | 2020 | % change |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | ||||
| A | FpsA1 | 1278 | 26.3 | 1316 | 29.5 | 3.0 | < 0.001 |
| FpsA2 | 570 | 11.7 | 458 | 10.3 | −19.6 | 0.024 | |
| B | FpsB1 | 405 | 8.3 | 367 | 8.2 | −9.4 | 0.851 |
| FpsA2 | 157 | 3.2 | 119 | 2.7 | −24.2 | 0.112 | |
| FpsB3 | 151 | 3.1 | 138 | 3.1 | −8.6 | 0.169 | |
| FpsB4 | 121 | 2.5 | 97 | 2.2 | −19.8 | 0.337 | |
| C | FpsC1 | 480 | 9.9 | 429 | 9.6 | −10.6 | 0.675 |
| FpsC2 | 321 | 6.6 | 287 | 6.4 | −10.6 | 0.737 | |
| D | FpsD1 | 248 | 5.1 | 240 | 5.4 | −3.2 | 0.577 |
| FpsD2 | 294 | 6.1 | 240 | 5.4 | −18.4 | 0.167 | |
| E | FpsE1 | 571 | 11.8 | 552 | 12.4 | −3.3 | 0.373 |
| FpsE2 | 261 | 5.4 | 219 | 4.9 | −16.1 | 0.325 | |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first identified in Wuhan City, Hubei province, China, on 12 December 2019,^1^ and was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on 11 March 2020.^2^ In response to the escalating pandemic, many countries, including South Africa, implemented public health interventions such as social distancing, mask-wearing, self-isolation, closure of businesses and schools, travel restrictions, bans on public events, and regulated movement of people.^3^ These measures have led to a variety of outcomes in South Africa, notably a reduction in non-natural deaths, but an increase in mortality because of natural causes.^4^ A similar trend has been observed in research conducted by Gunawardena et al. in Colombo, Sri Lanka.^5^
Forensic pathology services are pivotal in unravelling the details surrounding deaths, pinpointing causes, and determining the timing of these events.^6,7,8^ They have been instrumental in advancing our understanding and surveillance of diseases, aiding in both prevention and treatment strategies.^9,10^ Despite the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) setting forth clear guidelines for handling deceased individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic,^11,12^ there remained apprehensions. Varied responses were observed globally, with some nations foregoing clinical autopsies and others conducting them with reduced comprehensiveness.^13,14,15^
During the pandemic, low- and middle-income countries, including South Africa (SA) encountered considerable challenges, such as elevated infection rates and a scarcity of resources. Like other developing countries, SA experienced a lack of adequate personal protective equipment,^16^ which has led to fewer comprehensive autopsies being conducted.^13^ Despite the challenges faced, there is still a significant gap in empirical research evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on forensic pathology services in the Limpopo province. Therefore, the purpose of the present investigation was to investigate how COVID-19 pandemic has affected forensic pathology services in the South African province of Limpopo.
Methods
Study design and setting
The study entails a retrospective analysis of referred post-mortem cases across all forensic pathology mortuaries in Limpopo province. It spans from 01 January 2019 to 31 December 2019 (pre-COVID-19 pandemic) and from 01 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 (during the pandemic). The province hosts 12 forensic pathology facilities distributed within hospitals across its five districts. Among these, one is stand-alone, six are in district hospitals, four in regional hospitals, and one in a tertiary hospital. Each district, except for district B, possesses two such facilities.
Study population
The study encompassed all forensic post-mortem cases referred to and examined during the COVID-19 lockdown, as well as those during the corresponding period in the non-pandemic year.
Data collection
Data for this study were collected by trained data collectors, specifically forensic pathology officers, who extracted information from the death register and recorded it directly into a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet. The data collection process was supervised by the first author, a forensic pathologist, who performed quality checks and addressed any errors or inconsistencies. In addition, the forensic pathologist verified the assignment of the external cause of injury in certain instances.
Data analysis
The statistical analysis was conducted with STATA 16.0 software (StataCorp; College Station, TX, United States), presenting results as counts and percentages. The Pearson Chi-square test was employed for variable comparisons. A p-value < 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance.
Ethical considerations
The research initiative received ethical approval from the University of Limpopo (reference number: TREC/326/2020: PG) and given permission to proceed by the Limpopo Provincial Department of Health (reference number: LP_2024-01-002).
Results
A total of 9319 cases referred for post-mortem examinations, all of which were incorporated into the analysis. Among these cases, 4857 were reported before the pandemic, while 4462 were reported during the pandemic, marking an 8.1% decrease. Table 1 shows a significant reduction of 10.7% in unnatural deaths, decreasing from 4106 pre-COVID-19 to 3666 during the pandemic (p < 0.05). Likewise, undetermined deaths fell by 14.2%, from 190 prior to the pandemic to 163 during it, although this result was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conversely, there was a slight increase in the rate of natural deaths during the pandemic (9.1% compared to 8.1% pre-pandemic, p > 0.05), and the cases pending investigation rose from 3.4% to 5.0% (p < 0.05). An analysis of forensic examination referrals by district revealed a downward trend across all districts. Despite this overall decline, the decrease did not reach statistical significance in any district, as indicated by p-values > 0.05.
Table 2 presents the outcomes of a subgroup analysis within institutions, showing that District A observed a significant increase in the number of cases forwarded for investigation at forensic pathology service at a tertiary hospital (Fps A1), as indicated by a p < 0.05. In contrast, forensic pathology service at a district hospital (Fps A2) saw a significant decrease in case referrals of 19.6%, also with a p-value < 0.05. The remaining districts experienced notable decreases in the number of cases sent for investigation; however, these were not statistically significant, evidenced by p-values exceeding 0.05.
Discussion
The study focused on assessing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on forensic pathology services within a rural province in SA. The findings of this study contrast with previous studies that observed an increase in the number of cases requiring post-mortem examination,^5^ yet they concur with results from other studies,^17,18,19^ indicating a complex and multifaceted influence of the pandemic on forensic services. Our research corroborated the expected increase in natural deaths during the pandemic, as well as a notable decline in unnatural deaths. In contrast, some studies have observed a reduction in both natural and unnatural deaths amid the restrictions.^18^ This might be because of the study being carried out at a single facility with comparable data from before and during the lockdown. Consistent with our results, several studies have documented a significant decrease in unnatural deaths during the pandemic.^4,5,17,20^ The rise in natural deaths observed in our study may be associated with hospital reports of COVID-19 fatalities requiring autopsies because of claims of medical misconduct during the pandemic. In addition, the observed decrease in unnatural deaths could be because of a decline in road traffic accidents and homicides, possibly because of the ban on sales and consumption of alcohol.^21^
It should be noticed that the post-mortem cases under scrutiny increased remarkably during the period of COVID-19 pandemic in our study. This may result from an unforeseen death that occurred at home, either with a prior medical history or acute symptoms, and the post-mortem examination fails to disclose any apparent reasons of death. Consequently, additional tests, including microscopic inspection of tissue samples from organs and toxicological analysis of blood and other fluids, were necessary to exclude poisoning. Furthermore, inadequate proficiency in conducting autopsy on fatalities caused by infectious diseases was reported, particularly those transmitted asymptomatically.^22,23^ As a result, an enhanced investment in pathology and forensic training and practice is essential. Our research indicates a decline in the number of cases referred to post-mortem examinations across various facilities, with the sole exception of one facility located in tertiary hospital. This observation contrasts with a report from a tertiary hospital in India, which found a decrease in post-mortem cases following the pandemic.^19^ The increase in autopsies at this single facility could be because of its association with a tertiary care centre, which typically has forensic expertise, post-mortem referral of cases or it might stem from a lack of expertise at other facilities in performing autopsies on deaths caused by infectious diseases, particularly those that are transmitted without symptoms. Moreover, the high level of expertise at tertiary care centres may account for the specialised services they provide. Such a facility is often part of a larger healthcare system, offering a higher level of care that often involves intricate medical procedures and treatments that require specialised abilities and equipment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, forensic pathology services throughout all districts of this remote province have declined during the COVID-19 epidemic, affecting nearly all facilities. The facility in the tertiary hospital (FpsA1) was under great strain. This has resulted in new challenges for case management and required modifications to operating procedures. Notable increases in natural deaths may have contributed to a rise in medico-legal disputes, particularly in cases of hospital deaths linked to COVID-19. This circumstance emphasises how urgently specialised assistance is needed to handle the medico-legal problems resulting from allegations of medical malpractice during the pandemic.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Co V-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(3):105924. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.10592432081636 PMC 7127800 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):157–160. 10.23750/abm.v 91i 1.939732191675 PMC 7569573 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Tangcharoensathien V, Calleja N, Nguyen T, et al. Framework for managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Methods and results of an online, crowdsourced WHO technical consultation. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e 19659. 10.2196/1965932558655 PMC 7332158 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Bradshaw D, Dorrington RE, Laubscher R, Moultrie TA, Groenewald P. Tracking mortality in near to real-time provides essential information about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa in 2020. SAMJ. 2021;111(8):732–740. 10.7196/samj.2021.v 111i 8.1580935227353 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Gunawardena SA, Dassanayake N, Keerawelle BI, Kanthasamy S, Ranganatha H, Gunawardana JW. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the trends and characteristics of natural and unnatural deaths in an urban Sri Lankan cohort viewed through retrospective analysis of forensic death investigations from 2019 to 2022. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2023;14(6):468–482. 10.24171/j.phrp.2023.017538204426 PMC 10788415 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Goldman L. Autopsy 2018: Still necessary, even if occasionally not sufficient. Circulation. 2018;137(June (25)):2686–2688.29915094 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033236 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Bogdanović M, Atanasijević T, Popović V, Mihailović Z, Radnić B, Durmić T. Is the role of forensic medicine in the covid-19 pandemic underestimated? Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2021;17(1):136–138. 10.1007/s 12024-020-00308-232955718 PMC 7502652 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Pomara C, Li Volti G, Cappello F. COVID-19 deaths: Are we sure it is pneumonia? Please, autopsy, autopsy, autopsy! J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1259. 10.3390/jcm 905125932357503 PMC 7287760 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
