# Investigating the safety of physical rehabilitation with critically ill patients receiving vasoactive drugs: An exploratory observational feasibility study

**Authors:** Huw R. Woodbridge, Caroline M. Alexander, Stephen J. Brett, David B. Antcliffe, Ee Lyn Chan, Anthony C. Gordon

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318150 · PLOS ONE · 2025-02-13

## TL;DR

This study explores the feasibility of physical rehabilitation for critically ill patients on vasoactive drugs and finds it is rarely done but could be acceptable for a future trial.

## Contribution

The study provides feasibility data for designing a future randomized controlled trial on physical rehabilitation in this high-risk patient group.

## Key findings

- Only 8% of days with vasoactive drugs involved physical rehabilitation.
- 81% of patients and 88% of clinicians found a future trial acceptable.
- Mortality and patient-reported outcomes were most feasible to measure.

## Abstract

Physical rehabilitation of critically ill patients may improve physical outcomes; however, the relative benefits and risks with patients requiring vasoactive drugs is currently unknown. A feasibility study is needed to inform the design of a future trial required to address this issue.

A two-phase exploratory observational feasibility study was carried out:

A retrospective study to clarify the current practice of rehabilitation with patients receiving vasoactive drugs to inform future trial interventions and design.

A prospective study exploring recruitment and outcome measurement. Intensive care patients receiving vasoactive drugs were recruited and asked about the acceptability of a future trial. The feasibility of using an adverse event tool was measured during rehabilitation. Patients were followed up after 60 days to describe the feasibility of measuring outcomes for a future trial.

Retrospective study (n = 78): Twenty-one percent of patients took part in physical rehabilitation whilst receiving vasoactive drugs. Of 321 days with vasoactive drugs administered, physical rehabilitation occurred on 27 days (8%).

Prospective study (n = 40): Eighty-one percent of participants indicated acceptability of being recruited into a future trial (n = 37). Eighty-eight percent of clinicians found it acceptable to randomise patients into either early rehabilitation or standard care. The adverse event tool was implemented by researchers with 2% loss of information. Finally, a 100% follow-up rate at day 60 was achieved for mortality outcomes. Follow-up rates were 70% for the EQ-5D (5 level), 65% for the World Health Organisation’s Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 and RAND 36-item Health Survey 1.0 and 26% for the 6-minute walk test.

This study found a low frequency of physical rehabilitation occurring with intensive care patients receiving vasoactive drugs. A high proportion of clinicians and patients found a future RCT within this patient group acceptable. Mortality and patient-reported outcomes were the most feasible to measure.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Mortality (MESH:D003643), critically ill (MESH:D016638)
- **Chemicals:** vasoactive drugs (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11824961/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11824961/full.md

## References

65 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11824961/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11824961