# Men deny more than they believe about climate change on Twitter (X)

**Authors:** Mudit Kumar Singh

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303007 · PLOS ONE · 2025-02-13

## TL;DR

This paper finds that men on Twitter are more likely to deny climate change compared to women.

## Contribution

The study reveals gendered differences in climate change denial using global Twitter data over 13 years.

## Key findings

- Men show a stronger climate denier stance compared to women on Twitter.
- The multinomial regression model confirms a globally significant gender difference in climate change views.
- Neutral individuals are less represented in the climate change discourse compared to deniers and believers.

## Abstract

Climate change and twitter have been in scholarly and academic attention for study of human behaviour expressed on the popular social media platform. The sentiment of the tweets has been the subject of previous studies, and the most recent study used Twitter texts to examine seven aspects of climate change: denier/believer stance, sentiment, aggressiveness, temperature, gender, subjects and disasters, and their relationships. Amid the big pictures across these vital variables, we know very little about the extent to which the comparative gendered differences in views exist in the climate denier and believer groups shaping the climate change discussion. Using the large scale global twitter data from the past 13 years, this paper has examined the differences in the views of deniers and believers on climate change in comparison to the people neutral to climate change. Based on the expression on twitter, results of a sound multinomial regression model of this study indicates a globally strong climate denier stance of men.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** aggressiveness (MESH:D010554)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11824948/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11824948/full.md

## References

43 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11824948/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11824948