Gene model for the ortholog of eIF4E1 in Drosophila ananassae
McKenzie Chamberlain, Ali Christie, Jeremy Girard, Hannah M. Shaver, Lindsey J. Long, James J. Youngblom, Chinmay P. Rele, Laura K Reed

TL;DR
This paper presents a gene model for the eIF4E1 ortholog in Drosophila ananassae as part of a study on the evolution of the IIS pathway.
Contribution
The paper contributes a new gene model for eIF4E1 in Drosophila ananassae using a standardized annotation protocol.
Findings
The eIF4E1 ortholog was identified in the Drosophila ananassae genome assembly.
The gene model is part of a dataset for studying the evolution of the IIS pathway in Drosophila.
Abstract
Gene model for the ortholog of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E1 ( eIF4E1 ) in the May 2011 (Agencourt dana_caf1/DanaCAF1) Genome Assembly (GenBank Accession: GCA_000005115.1 ) of Drosophila ananassae . This ortholog was characterized as part of a developing dataset to study the evolution of the Insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway (IIS) across the genus Drosophila using the Genomics Education Partnership gene annotation protocol for Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1|
"In this GEP CURE protocol students use web-based tools to manually annotate genes in non-model
“The particular gene ortholog described here was characterized as part of a developing dataset to study the evolution of the Insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway (IIS) across the genus
“
“
|
- —National Science Foundation (United States)https://ror.org/021nxhr62
- —National Institutes of Health (United States)https://ror.org/01cwqze88
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Description
**: **
We propose a gene model for the D. ananassae ortholog of the D. melanogaster *eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E1 * ( * eIF4E1 * ) gene. The genomic region of the ortholog corresponds to the uncharacterized protein LOC6506375 (RefSeq accession LOC6506375 ) in the Dana_CAF1 Genome Assembly of D. ananassae (GenBank Accession: GCA_000005115.1 ; Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium et al., 2007). This model is based on RNA-Seq data from D. ananassae ( SRP006203 ; SRP007906
- Graveley et al., 2010) and
eIF4E1 * in *D. melanogaster * using FlyBase release FB2022_04 ( GCA_000001215.4 ; Larkin et al., 2021; Gramates et al., 2022; Jenkins et al., 2022).
** Synteny **
The reference gene, * eIF4E1 , * occurs on chromosome 3L in *D. melanogaster * and is flanked upstream by * CG4022 * and *Cuticular protein 67B * ( * Cpr67B * ) and downstream by * CG4080 * and *Heat shock protein 23 * ( * Hsp23 * ). The tblastn search of D. melanogaster eIF4E1-PB (query) against the D. ananassae (GenBank Accession: GCA_000005115.1 ) Genome Assembly (database) placed the putative ortholog of * eIF4E1 * within scaffold scaffold_13337 ( CH902618.1 ) at locus LOC6506375 ( XP_014764725.1 ) — with an E-value of 8e-131 and a percent identity of 80.80%. Furthermore, the putative ortholog is flanked upstream by LOC6506374 ( XP_001958001.1 ) and LOC6493561 ( XP_001958000.1 ), which correspond to * CG4022 * and * Cpr67B * in *D. melanogaster * (E-value: 6e-118 and 1e-168; identity: 88.17% and 97.31%, respectively, as determined by blastp ) ( Figure 1A, A ltschul et al., 1990). The putative ortholog of * eIF4E1 * is flanked downstream by LOC6506376 ( XP_001957998.1 ) and LOC6493560 ( XP_001957997.1 ), which correspond to * CG4080 * and * Hsp23 * in D. melanogaster (E-value: 0.0 and 2e-103; identity: 87.56% and 83.08%, respectively, as determined by blastp ). The putative ortholog assignment for * eIF4E1 * in D. ananassae is supported by the following evidence: The genes surrounding the * eIF4E1 * ortholog are orthologous to the genes at the same locus in D. melanogaster and synteny is completely conserved, supported by results generated from blastp , so we conclude that LOC6506375 is the correct ortholog of * eIF4E1 * in D. ananassae ( Figure 1A ).
** Protein Model **
eIF4E1 * in
- D. ananassae * contains two unique protein-coding isoforms: eIF4E1-PB (identical to eIF4E1-PA, eIF4E1-PD, eIF4E1-PE, eIF4E1-PF, eIF4E1-PG, eIF4E1-PH, eIF4E1-PI) and eIF4E1-PC ( Figure 1B ). mRNA isoforms ( eIF4E1-RB , eIF4E1-RA , eIF4E1-RD , eIF4E1-RE , eIF4E1-RF , eIF4E1-RG , eIF4E1-RH , eIF4E1-RI ) contain five CDSs but differ in their UTRs. eIF4E1-RC differs from the other isoforms only in the first CDS. The remaining protein-coding isoforms are identical. Relative to the ortholog in D. melanogaster , the RNA CDS number and the protein isoform count are conserved. The sequence of eIF4E1-PB in
- D. ananassae* has 80.80% identity (E-value: 8e-131) with the protein-coding isoform eIF4E1-PB in D. melanogaster , as determined by
- blastp * ( Figure 1C ). Three indels were found within the second CDS of D. ananassae , outlined in boxes purple labeled I, II, and III ( Figure 1C, 1D ). Two regions containing a lack of sequence similarity were found between eIF4E1-PB in D. ananassae and D. melanogaster , outlined in green boxes labeled IV and V ( Figure 1C, 1D ). Coordinates of this curated gene model (eIF4E1-PE, eIF4E1-PF, eIF4E1-PH, eIF4E1-PA, eIF4E1-PG, eIF4E1-PI, eIF4E1-PD, eIF4E1-PB, eIF4E1-PC) are stored by NCBI at GenBank/BankIt (accessions BK064567 , BK064568 , BK064569 , BK064570 , BK064571 , BK064572 , BK064573 , BK064574 , and BK064575 , respectively). These data are also archived in the CaltechDATA repository (see “Extended Data” section below).
** Special characteristics of the protein model **
Three indels within CDS two, found in isoform eIF4E1-RB , are shown in the dot plot and protein alignment outlined by the purple boxes labeled I, II, and III ( Figure 1C and 1D). The first indel (I) consists of seven amino acids and is an insertion in *D. ananassae * and relative to D. melanogaster . The second (II) consists of four amino acids while the third (III) consists of two amino acids. Both (II and III) show deletions in D. ananassae relative to D. melanogaster .
Methods
Detailed methods including algorithms, database versions, and citations for the complete annotation process can be found in Rele et al. (2023). Briefly, students use the GEP instance of the UCSC Genome Browser v.435 ( https://gander.wustl.edu ; Kent WJ et al., 2002; Navarro Gonzalez et al., 2021) to examine the genomic neighborhood of their reference IIS gene in the D. melanogaster genome assembly (Aug. 2014; BDGP Release 6 + ISO1 MT/dm6). Students then retrieve the protein sequence for the D. melanogaster reference gene for a given isoform and run it using tblastn against their target *Drosophila * species genome assembly on the NCBI BLAST server ( https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi ; Altschul et al., 1990) to identify potential orthologs. To validate the potential ortholog, students compare the local genomic neighborhood of their potential ortholog with the genomic neighborhood of their reference gene in D. melanogaster . This local synteny analysis includes at minimum the two upstream and downstream genes relative to their putative ortholog. They also explore other sets of genomic evidence using multiple alignment tracks in the Genome Browser, including BLAT alignments of RefSeq Genes, Spaln alignment of
- D. melanogaster* proteins, multiple gene prediction tracks (e.g., GeMoMa, Geneid, Augustus), and modENCODE RNA-Seq from the target species. Detailed explanation of how these lines of genomic evidenced are leveraged by students in gene model development are described in Rele et al. (2023). Genomic structure information (e.g., CDSs, intron-exon number and boundaries, number of isoforms) for the D. melanogaster reference gene is retrieved through the Gene Record Finder ( https://gander.wustl.edu/~wilson/dmelgenerecord/index.html ; Rele et al *., * 2023). Approximate splice sites within the target gene are determined using tblastn using the CDSs from the D. melanogaste r reference gene. Coordinates of CDSs are then refined by examining aligned modENCODE RNA-Seq data, and by applying paradigms of molecular biology such as identifying canonical splice site sequences and ensuring the maintenance of an open reading frame across hypothesized splice sites. Students then confirm the biological validity of their target gene model using the Gene Model Checker ( https://gander.wustl.edu/~wilson/dmelgenerecord/index.html ; Rele et al., 2023), which compares the structure and translated sequence from their hypothesized target gene model against the *D. melanogaster * reference gene model. At least two independent models for a gene are generated by students under mentorship of their faculty course instructors. Those models are then reconciled by a third independent researcher mentored by the project leaders to produce the final model. Note: comparison of 5' and 3' UTR sequence information is not included in this GEP CURE protocol.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Altschul SF Gish W Miller W Myers EW Lipman DJ 1990105 Basic local alignment search tool.J Mol Biol 21530022-283640341010.1016/S 0022-2836(05)80360-22231712 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Bock IR, Wheeler MR. (1972). The Drosophila melanogaster species group. Univ. Texas Publs Stud. Genet. 7(7213): 1-102. F Brf 0024428
- 3Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium. Clark AG Eisen MB Smith DR Bergman CM Oliver B Markow TA Kaufman TC Kellis M Gelbart W Iyer VN Pollard DA Sackton TB Larracuente AM Singh ND Abad JP Abt DN Adryan B Aguade M Akashi H Anderson WW Aquadro CF Ardell DH Arguello R Artieri CG Barbash DA Barker D Barsanti P Batterham P Batzoglou S Begun D Bhutkar A Blanco E Bosak SA Bradley RK Brand AD Brent MR Brooks AN Brown RH Butlin RK Caggese C Calvi BR Bernardo de Carvalho A Caspi A Castrezana S Celniker SE Chang JL Chapple C Chatterji S Chinwalla A Civetta A C · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Gonnet GH Cohen MA Benner SA 199265 Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database.Science 25650620036-80751443144510.1126/science.16043191604319 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Gramates L Sian Agapite Julie Attrill Helen Calvi Brian R Crosby Madeline A dos Santos Gilberto Goodman Joshua L Goutte-Gattat Damien Jenkins Victoria K Kaufman Thomas Larkin Aoife Matthews Beverley B Millburn Gillian Strelets Victor B Perrimon Norbert Gelbart Susan Russo Agapite Julie Broll Kris Crosby Lynn dos Santos Gil Falls Kathleen Gramates L Sian Jenkins Victoria Longden Ian Matthews Beverley Seme Jolene Tabone Christopher J Zhou Pinglei Zytkovicz Mark Brown Nick Antonazzo Giulia Attrill Helen Garapati Phani Goutte-Gatta · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Grewal SS 20081018 Insulin/TOR signaling in growth and homeostasis: a view from the fly world.Int J Biochem Cell Biol 4151357-27251006101010.1016/j.biocel.2008.10.01018992839 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Hernández Greco Han Hong Gandin Valentina Fabian Lacramioara Ferreira Tiago Zuberek Joanna Sonenberg Nahum Brill Julie A. Lasko Paul 201291 Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-3 is essential for meiotic chromosome segregation, cytokinesis and male fertility in Drosophila Development 139171477-91293211322010.1242/dev.07312222833128 PMC 3413165 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Hietakangas V Cohen SM 2009 Regulation of tissue growth through nutrient sensing.Annu Rev Genet 430066-419738941010.1146/annurev-genet-102108-13481519694515 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
