Both Isolated Long Head of the Biceps Tenotomy and Tenodesis Are Effective for Symptomatic Rotator Cuff Repair Revision

TL;DR

This study shows that both tenotomy and tenodesis of the biceps tendon are effective for treating persistent shoulder pain after a failed rotator cuff repair.

Contribution

The study compares the effectiveness of isolated biceps tenotomy and tenodesis as revision procedures for symptomatic rotator cuff repair.

Findings

Both tenotomy and tenodesis significantly improved pain and shoulder function after 24 months.

No significant difference in outcomes was found between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups.

Tenodesis may reduce the risk of Popeye deformity without compromising clinical benefits.

Abstract

Background: Symptomatic rotator cuff (RC) repair continues to be a complex issue. Leaving the long head of the biceps (LHB) in place might increase the risk of residual pain, even in the case of a healed RC. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of isolated LHB tenotomy and tenodesis as a revision procedure in symptomatic patients that had previously undergone an arthroscopic RC repair with no clinical or MRI evidence of RC retear. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with a persisting painful shoulder after an arthroscopic RC repair with no clinical or MRI signs of cuff retear, undergoing an isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis as a revision procedure. Functional outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. Results: A total of 88 patients were included. The biceps tendon was managed with biceps tenodesis in 64 patients and tenotomy in 24 patients. VAS, Constant Score, SSV and active anterior elevation were all significantly improved after revision surgery. There was no significant difference between pre- and postoperative anterior passive elevation. No significant difference was shown between the tenodesis and tenotomy groups. Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that both isolated tenotomy and tenodesis are effective and safe in treating patients with a symptomatic shoulder after RC repair at a 2-year follow-up with a very low complication rate. Although tenodesis did not show any significant clinical benefit outcomes compared to tenotomy, it might be associated with a lower risk of Popeye deformity.

Figures