How People in Eight European Countries Felt About the Safety, Effectiveness, and Necessity of COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Survey
Kristien Coteur, Marija Zafirovska, Aleksandar Zafirovski, Jelena Danilenko, Heidrun Lingner, Felix Bauch, Christine Brütting, Nicola Buono, Vanja Lazic, Liljana Ramasaco, Vija Silina, Lara-Marie Fuehner, Michael Harris

TL;DR
This study surveyed people in eight European countries about their views on the safety, effectiveness, and necessity of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into public attitudes toward vaccination across different European countries.
Findings
Only 44.1% of respondents considered the vaccines safe, 43.5% effective, and 44.9% necessary.
Younger people, well-informed individuals, and Germans were more likely to see vaccination as effective and necessary.
Feeling well-informed about vaccines correlated with higher vaccination rates.
Abstract
Background/objectives: Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination vary globally, influenced by political and cultural factors. This research aimed to assess the views of people without a healthcare qualification in Europe on COVID-19 vaccination safety, effectiveness, and necessity as well as how well informed they felt. The secondary outcomes focused on how respondents’ views were affected by demographic and context factors and included a comparison by country of the level of feeling well informed. Methods: A mixed-method cross-sectional online survey in eight European countries, using convenience sampling. Results: A total of 1008 adults completed the survey, 60% of whom were female. While only 44.1% considered the vaccines safe, 43.5% effective, and 44.9% necessary, 80.0% had been vaccinated. Four in ten adults strongly agreed that they were well informed, while over a quarter did not…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
