# Populist attitudes and belief in conspiracy theories: anti-elitist attitudes and the preference for unrestricted popular sovereignty reduce the positive impact of an analytical thinking style on conspiracy beliefs

## TL;DR

The study explores how populist attitudes and belief in conspiracy theories are linked, finding that anti-elitism and preference for popular sovereignty reduce the protective effect of analytical thinking on conspiracy beliefs.

## Contribution

The study reveals that populist attitudes moderate the relationship between analytical thinking and conspiracy beliefs, offering new insights into the psychological mechanisms behind conspiracy belief formation.

## Key findings

- Populist attitudes moderately correlate with conspiracy beliefs.
- Anti-elitism and preference for popular sovereignty reduce the impact of analytical thinking on conspiracy beliefs.
- Populist attitudes may lower motivation to use effortful thinking to challenge conspiracy beliefs.

## Abstract

Populist attitudes and the tendency to believe in specific conspiracy theories (conspiracy beliefs) are often exploited by extremist or populist parties. However, more scientific research is needed to scrutinize this association. Consequently, the present non-preregistered exploratory online study assessed whether and how conspiracy beliefs and populist attitudes are associated and whether populist attitudes moderate the association between the preference for an analytical or intuitive thinking style and conspiracy beliefs.

We assessed 483 nonclinical individuals regarding their conspiracy beliefs, populist attitudes, and thinking styles and found a moderate correlation between populist attitudes and conspiracy beliefs. Conspiracy beliefs were significantly predicted by three facets of populist attitudes (anti-elitism, preference for unrestricted popular sovereignty, and belief in the homogeneity and virtuousness of the people). Anti-elitist attitudes and a preference for unrestricted popular sovereignty significantly moderated (reduced) the impact of an analytical thinking style on conspiracy beliefs. Anti-elitism and a preference for popular sovereignty might enhance a person’s vulnerability to conspiracy beliefs. We assume that these populistic attitudes reduce a person’s motivation to use a more effortful thinking style to reinterpret ideology-inconsistent information to protect existing conspiracy beliefs. Our results provide new insights into the interplay between conspiracy beliefs, populism, and a preference for an analytical/more effortful thinking style.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-025-07136-z.