# Multimodal strategies to hand hygiene in Ghanaian hospitals: a cross-sectional study in the Eastern Region of Ghana

**Authors:** Stephen Dajaan Dubik, Kingsly E Amegah, Ama Akyampomaa Owusu-Asare, Akosua Takyiwa Kwakye, Christiana Akufo, Joyce Amponsah, Hectoria Awekeya, Leslie Vander Puije, Jocelyn Asibey, Seth Twum, Francis Mensa Akwetey, Portia Sam, Winfred Ofosu, Angela Ackon, Sofonias Asrat, Hedidor George Kwesi, Sally-Ann Ohene, Mary Eyram Ashinyo

PMC · DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000606 · BMJ Public Health · 2024-02-05

## TL;DR

This study assessed hand hygiene practices in Ghanaian hospitals and found that most had intermediate implementation levels, with reminders being the weakest area.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the implementation of WHO multimodal hand hygiene strategies in Ghanaian healthcare facilities.

## Key findings

- Most healthcare facilities had an intermediate level of hand hygiene implementation.
- Reminders in the workplace scored the lowest, with less than half having HH posters.
- Government and non-government facilities showed no significant difference in HH implementation levels.

## Abstract

Hand hygiene (HH) is one of the core components of infection prevention and control and is critical for a high quality of care. Multimodal approaches are recommended to strengthen and drive HH systems in healthcare facilities (HCFs). We aimed to assess the extent of implementation of the WHO HH multimodal improvement strategy in HCFs in the Eastern Region of Ghana.

This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study involving 22 HCFs from 17 districts in the Eastern Region of Ghana. We collected data from 22 hospitals using the WHO Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework (HHSAF). Data were analysed through descriptive statistics.

The HHSAF median score denotes an intermediate HH implementation level (53.5%, IQR 48.8%–58.3%). Fourteen HCFs attained an intermediate level, five attained basic level, one attained advanced level and no facility exhibited inadequate HH implementation level. Evaluation and feedback had the highest score (64.3%, IQR 50%–71.4%), as ward-based audits for the availability of HH resources have become standard practice in many of the HCFs. Reminders in the workplace had the lowest score (33.3%, IQR 25.9%–37.0%), whereby less than half (46%) of the HCFs had posters explaining the indications for HH and the correct use of alcohol-based hand rubs. HH implementation level did not differ significantly among government (M=49.97, SD=12.30) and non-government (M=53.32, SD=18.73) facilities, (t (20)=−0.503, p=0.621).

Most HCFs had an intermediate HH implementation level. The provision of HH resources, including posters, HH rounds in patient care areas, introduction of HH corners, leadership, financial and organisational support are key elements for increased compliance with the WHO HH multimodal improvement strategy.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infection (MESH:D007239), Hand Hygiene (MESH:D006230)
- **Chemicals:** alcohol (MESH:D000438)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11816844/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11816844/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11816844