# RETRACTION: A Meta‐Analysis of the Effect of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Compared with Gastrectomy on the Wound Infection in Early Stomach Cancer Subjects

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/iwj.70233 · International Wound Journal · 2025-02-11

## TL;DR

This retracted paper originally claimed to compare wound infection rates from two early stomach cancer treatments but was found to have used a compromised peer review process.

## Contribution

The paper's findings and analysis are invalid due to a fraudulent peer review process.

## Key findings

- The article was retracted due to a compromised peer review process.
- No valid conclusions or contributions to the field were made.
- The authors did not respond to the retraction notice.

## Abstract

RETRACTION:

SunC.
, 
LiuW.
, 
JiangJ.
, 
ZhangH.
, 
WangP.
, 
SunJ.
, and 
SunA.
, “A Meta‐Analysis of the Effect of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Compared with Gastrectomy on the Wound Infection in Early Stomach Cancer Subjects,” International Wound Journal
20, no. 6 (2023): 2087–2094, 10.1111/iwj.14078.36629038
PMC10333015

The above article, published online on 11 January 2023, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor in Chief, Professor Keith Harding; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Following an investigation by the publisher, all parties have concluded that this article was accepted solely on the basis of a compromised peer review process. The editors have therefore decided to retract the article. The authors did not respond to our notice regarding the retraction.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Stomach Cancer (MESH:D013274), Wound Infection (MESH:D014946)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11813700/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11813700