# Changes in salivary biomarkers of burning mouth syndrome patients after clonazepam treatment

**Authors:** Sungil Jang, Ji-Eun Kim, Young-Hee Lee, Won Jung

PMC · DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2024.019 · Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache · 2024-06-12

## TL;DR

This study found that changes in salivary α-amylase activity may help assess treatment response in burning mouth syndrome patients after clonazepam use.

## Contribution

The study identifies salivary α-amylase activity as a potential biomarker for evaluating treatment response in burning mouth syndrome.

## Key findings

- Salivary biomarker levels showed no significant differences between responders and non-responders.
- Change in salivary α-amylase activity after treatment differed significantly between responders and non-responders (p = 0.039).
- Salivary α-amylase activity may be a potential biomarker for burning mouth syndrome due to its link with orofacial pain and stress.

## Abstract

There is a lack of objective indicators to evaluate the treatment effect of 
burning mouth syndrome, a neuropathic pain of unknown causes. Therefore, this 
study aimed to evaluate potential salivary biomarkers by analyzing saliva before 
and after clonazepam treatment in patients with burning mouth syndrome. Saliva 
was collected from 23 patients with burning mouth syndrome before and 4 weeks 
after the topical administration of clonazepam. Patients were classified as 
responders (pain relief of 50% or more, n = 10) or non-responders (n = 13) based 
on pain relief after treatment. Clinical examination data of responders and 
non-responders were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test. 
Changes in the level of salivary biomarkers (salivary α-amylase, 
cortisol, calmodulin, α-enolase and interleukin-18) were evaluated 
before and after treatment using Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test, and their 
association with treatment response was examined using Fisher’s exact test. The 
salivary biomarker levels showed no significant differences between the 
responders and non-responders. However, the change in salivary α-amylase 
activity after treatment revealed a significant difference between the two groups 
(p = 0.039). Although not all patients showed the same pattern, there 
was a difference in the alteration of salivary α-amylase activity before 
and after treatment between responders and non-responders. Further study is 
required to clarify whether there is a causal relationship between salivary 
α-amylase activity and treatment response. However, considering that 
salivary α-amylase activity is related to orofacial pain and 
psychological stress, this suggests the potential use of salivary 
α-amylase as a biomarker for burning mouth syndrome.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** CALM1 (calmodulin 1), IL18 (interleukin 18)
- **Chemicals:** clonazepam (PubChem CID 2802)
- **Diseases:** burning mouth syndrome (MONDO:0006687)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** ENO1 (enolase 1) [NCBI Gene 2023] {aka ENO1-IT1, ENO1L1, HEL-S-17, MPB1, NNE, PPH}, CALM1 (calmodulin 1) [NCBI Gene 801] {aka CALML2, CAM2, CAM3, CAMB, CAMC, CAMI}, IL18 (interleukin 18) [NCBI Gene 3606] {aka IGIF, IL-18, IL-1g, IL1F4}
- **Diseases:** pain (MESH:D010146), orofacial pain (MESH:D005157), burning mouth syndrome (MESH:D002054), neuropathic pain (MESH:D009437)
- **Chemicals:** cortisol (MESH:D006854), clonazepam (MESH:D002998)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11810660/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11810660/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11810660/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11810660