# Clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancer

**Authors:** Huimin Wang, Xiaocen Li, Ying Jiang, Jinxin Chen, Rong Cao, Jingru Zhang

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1500042 · Frontiers in Oncology · 2025-01-27

## TL;DR

This study compares different methods of intestinal reconstruction after surgery for advanced ovarian cancer and identifies which method is best suited for specific patient conditions.

## Contribution

The study provides clinical guidelines for selecting intestinal reconstruction methods based on patient-specific surgical and postoperative factors.

## Key findings

- Colostomy is preferable for patients with large ascites, hypoproteinemia, and high PCI.
- Intestinal anastomosis is suitable for patients with optimal cytoreduction and fewer complications.
- Protective enterostomy combined with anastomosis is advantageous for patients with multiple anastomoses or high ascites volume.

## Abstract

To compare different intestinal reconstruction methods after intestinal resection for advanced ovarian malignancy.

Retrospective data of patients with advanced ovarian malignancy were collected and then assigned into three groups: primary intestinal anastomosis, protective enterostomy and colostomy. General clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings and postoperative outcomes were compared between the three groups.

A total of 530 cases were included for final analysis. The colostomy group had a lower serum albumin level, larger volume of ascites, higher likelihood of multiple intestinal resections and lower likelihood of rectal resection, lower peritoneal cancer index, more intraoperative blood loss, transfusions and infusions, lower likelihood of optimal cytoreductive surgery and shorter interval time to chemotherapy than the other two groups (p < 0.05). The primary intestinal anastomosis group exhibited a larger blood transfusion volume, higher incidence rates of anastomotic leak and electrolyte disturbance, and longer times to first flatus, first feeding and drain removal than the other two groups (p < 0.05).

Colostomy can be adopted for advanced ovarian cancer patients with a large ascites volume, hypoproteinemia, large intraoperative blood and fluid loss volumes, multiple intestinal resections, anastomoses located below the peritoneal reflection, high PCI and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery. For patients with good intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, one anastomosis, an anastomosis located above the peritoneal reflection, low PCI or optimal cytoreductive surgery, intestinal anastomosis can be carried out to restore the normal physiological function of the intestine. For patients with a large volume of ascites (≥500 mL), multiple anastomoses or an anastomosis located below the peritoneal reflection, intestinal anastomosis combined with protective enterostomy has an advantage over intestinal anastomosis alone.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** ovarian cancer (MONDO:0005140)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** peritoneal cancer (MESH:D010534), anastomotic leak (MESH:D057868), ovarian cancer (MESH:D010051), hypoproteinemia (MESH:D007019), ascites (MESH:D001201)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11807814/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11807814/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11807814/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11807814