# A single-centre, retrospective study on the impact of omitting preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on wound infections in minor orthopedic implant removals

**Authors:** Cyrill Pfammatter, Jan Hambrecht, Yannik Kalbas, Valentin Neuhaus, Christian Hierholzer, Claudio Canal

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02769-y · European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery · 2025-02-07

## TL;DR

This study found that skipping antibiotics before minor orthopedic implant removals doesn't increase infection risks.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence that preoperative antibiotics may be unnecessary for minor implant removal surgeries.

## Key findings

- No deep wound infections were observed in patients who skipped preoperative antibiotics.
- Wound-healing disorders occurred at similar rates with or without preoperative antibiotics.

## Abstract

The use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (POAP) in elective implant removal (IR) is controversial due to a lack of evidence-based recommendations. First-generation cephalosporins, which are commonly used in orthopedic IR, are believed to reduce wound infection risks. However, the potential for serious side effects had raised concerns about their necessity. This study was intended to evaluate whether omitting POAP in small IR increases the risk of wound infections.

This retrospective, single-centre cohort study was conducted at a level I trauma centre in Switzerland, including patients who underwent IR between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. The IR procedures involved the upper extremities (UEs), such as the clavicle, olecranon, radius and ulna, as well as the lower extremities (LEs), such as the patella, tibia, fibula, (bi)malleolar and foot. Postoperative follow-up included clinical and radiological evaluations 6 weeks after surgery. The outcomes assessed were deep wound infections, wound healing complications, refractures, persistent pain, bleeding, neurovascular injuries and muscle hernias.

Of the 273 patients (mean age: 42.1 ± 14.5; 44% female), 117 (42.9%) received POAP. In the LE group (n = 141), 51.1% received POAP; in the UE group (n = 132), 34.1% received POAP. Eleven (4.0%) wound-healing disorders were documented, with five (4.3%) in the POAP group and six (3.8%) in the non-POAP group (p = 1). No deep wound infections were observed.

Withholding POAP in elective IR procedures does not significantly increase wound infection rates, suggesting it may be unnecessary in uncomplicated cases.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** cephalosporins (PubChem CID 25058126)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** muscle hernias (MESH:D006547), pain (MESH:D010146), wound infection (MESH:D014946), trauma (MESH:D014947), neurovascular injuries (MESH:D013901), bleeding (MESH:D006470)
- **Chemicals:** cephalosporins (MESH:D002511)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11805721/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11805721/full.md

## References

2 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11805721/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11805721