Analysis of the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit and its correlation with measures of muscle strength in critically ill patients during hospitalization in the intensive care unit

Abstract

Figures

A](#f1) and [1B](#f1)). The MRC-SS cutoffs for independence in the FSS-ICU were 49 points (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.912; 95%CI = 0.826 − 0.998; p < 0.001) for pre-ambulation and 57 points (AUC = 0.923; 95%CI = 0.838 − 1.000; p = 0.001) for ambulation. For HGS, the cutoff values were 16kg/f (AUC = 0.769; 95%CI = 0.610 − 0.929; p = 0.007) and 18kg/f (AUC = 0.720; 95%CI = 0.511 − 0.929; p = 0.008) ([Figure 1C](#f1) and [1D](#f1)).

Full text

Advancements in intensive care have led to a reduction in mortality rates in intensive care units (ICUs), resulting in increased survival of critically ill patients but also increased challenges in health care and in the long-term recovery of survivors.^(1,2)^ Early measurement of functional status (FS) and muscle strength (MS) and follow-up measurements in the ICU are essential for identifying patients with physical decline, monitoring the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions and observing the evolution of recovery.^(2)^ A scoping review^(3)^ reported the existence of approximately 60 instruments for assessing FS, although no gold standard has been established.

In this context, we evaluated the progression of FS and MS during the duration of ICU stays. We determined the association of the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU) with MS. We assessed the predictive value of MS measurements for patient independence in the FSS-ICU at awakening. We performed a prospective observational cohort study in which patients were followed from awakening until discharge from the ICU. Functional status was assessed with the FSS-ICU, and MS was assessed with the Medical Research Council-Sum Score (MRC-SS) and handgrip strength (HGS). The present study was approved by the Committee for Ethics in Human Research of the Fundação de Ensino e Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde/ESCS (CAEE 30442514.7.0000.5553).

The assessments were performed upon awakening and upon discharge from the ICU, and the results were compared via the paired Wilcoxon test. Associations were determined via Spearman's correlation, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cutoff points for MS. A complete description of the methods can be found in the Supplementary Material (Table S1 and Figure S1). The sample consisted of 48 participants who were predominantly males (62%), with a mean age of 49 ± 16 years and a median (interquartile deviation [IQD]) duration of ICU stay of 10 (14) days (Table 1). This results are similar to those identified in a review study of 113 Brazilian intensive care units.^(4)^

During the ICU stay, we observed differences in the total FSS-ICU score between awakening and discharge and between the pre-ambulation and ambulation scores (p < 0.001), similar to the differences observed in MS as evaluated by the MRC-SS (p = 0.002) and HGS (p = 0.001). Most patients were right-handed (71%) (Table 1). Similar results were observed in other cohort studies conducted in Australia,^(5)^ the United States^(6)^ and Brazil.^(7)^

The FSS-ICU score was significantly correlated with the MRC-SS (rho = 0.74 and rho = 0.75) and HGS (rho = 0.57 and rho = 0.42) at awakening and at discharge (Figure 1A and 1B). The MRC-SS cutoffs for independence in the FSS-ICU were 49 points (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.912; 95%CI = 0.826 − 0.998; p < 0.001) for pre-ambulation and 57 points (AUC = 0.923; 95%CI = 0.838 − 1.000; p = 0.001) for ambulation. For HGS, the cutoff values were 16kg/f (AUC = 0.769; 95%CI = 0.610 − 0.929; p = 0.007) and 18kg/f (AUC = 0.720; 95%CI = 0.511 − 0.929; p = 0.008) (Figure 1C and 1D).

Associations among the FSS-ICU, MRC-SS and HGS and with other functional scales have been demonstrated in the literature.^(8-10)^ To date, no studies have evaluated the cutoff values for MS prediction in the FSS-ICU. However, one cohort study suggested a minimum cutoff of 41.5 out of 60 points on the MRC-SS as a predictor of the performance of the functional components of the Physical Function Intensive Care Test (PFIT) at ICU discharge.^(9)^ Our findings demonstrate that the FSS-ICU, MRC-SS and HGS are effective tools for measuring the progression of patient functionality in the ICU. In addition, the strength measures demonstrated a significant association with the functional independence of patients.

Supplementary Material