Correction: The salivary microbiota of patients with acute lower respiratory tract infection–A multicenter cohort study
Matthew B. Rogers, Ashley Harner, Megan Buhay, Brian Firek, Barbara Methé, Alison Morris, Octavia M. Peck Palmer, Susan B. Promes, Robert L. Sherwin, Lauren Southerland, Alexandre R. Vieira, Sachin Yende, Michael J. Morowitz, David T. Huang
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions · Gut microbiota and health · Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
The Supporting Information files (S1–S4 Figs, S1 Table, and S1–S3 Appendices) are uploaded incorrectly. Please view the correct S1–S4 Figs, S1 Table, and S1–S3 Appendices below.
Supporting information
S1 FigScatter plot of differentially abundant taxa between LRTI group and control group predicted by LOCOM method.Taxonomic families appear along the and points are distributed along the X-axis according to effect size. Size of point indicates mean relative abundance of each family.(EPS)
S2 FigVolcano plot of differentially abundant taxa between Pittsburgh baseline saliva samples and those of other cities.Taxa predicted by ANCOM-BC to be either enriched in other cities compared against Pittsburgh. Taxa enriched in the above cities appear to the right of the dotted line and vary along the x-axis according to their log-fold difference in abundance (those to the right are higher in the compared city; those to the left are higher in Pittsburgh). The y-axis shows the -log10 (FDR) value, taxa above 0.05 significance are labelled. Blue and red shading indicate whether the family is typical is the oral or gut microbiota respectively.(EPS)
S3 FigVolcano plot of differentially abundant taxa between the healthy cohort and baseline saliva samples from the Pittsburgh LRTI cohort and those of other cities.Taxa enriched in the above cities appear to the right of the dotted line and vary along the x-axis according to their log-fold difference in abundance (those to the right are higher in the compared city; those to the left are higher in the healthy cohort). The y-axis shows the -log10 (FDR)value, taxa above 0.05 significance are labelled. Blue and red shading indicate whether the family is typical is the oral or gut microbiota, respectively.(EPS)
S4 FigCorrelogram of patient metadata and LRTI types showing relationships between variables.Size of circles indicate strength of correlation by R2 value. Shading of circle also indicates strength of correlation by R2 value, blue shading indicates correlation, red shading indicates inverse correlation. Variables are clustered by R2 value using hclust. Only associations with a p-value < 0.05 (Pearson metric) are shown.(EPS)
S1 TableResults of statistical tests.(XLSX)
S1 AppendixIllustrated procedures for collecting saliva samples.(PDF)
S2 AppendixIllustrated procedures for collecting fecal samples.(PDF)
S3 AppendixInventory of each collection kit and information on storage and shipping of samples.(DOCX)
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.