Molecular detection of Trypanosoma minasense in captive black-faced black spider monkeys Ateles chamek (mammalia; primate)
Louise Bach Kmetiuk, Ana Silvia Miranda Passerino, Marcelo Bonat, Vívien Midori Morikawa, Alice Pereira Berbigier, André Luiz Rodrigues Roque, Fabiano Borges Figueiredo, Alexander Welker Biondo

TL;DR
Researchers found a new type of trypanosome parasite in spider monkeys at a Brazilian zoo for the first time.
Contribution
This is the first report of Trypanosoma minasense in black-faced black spider monkeys and in non-human primates in southern Brazil.
Findings
Four out of 17 spider monkeys tested positive for Trypanosoma spp. using PCR.
Sequencing confirmed the presence of Trypanosoma minasense in the infected monkeys.
Abstract
The present study aimed to assess Trypanosoma spp. infection in 17 captive black-faced black spider monkeys (Ateles chamek), living at the Zoological Garden of Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Blood samples (3 mL) were collected by femoral puncture by certified veterinarians. A total of 5 μL of extracted blood DNA was submitted to Nested-PCR 18S rDNA. In overall, 4/17 (23.5%) spider monkeys were positive to Trypanosoma spp. by PCR. Sequencing results for 18S rDNA revealed Trypanosoma minasense infection. This is the first report of T. minasense in black-faced black spider monkey worldwide and the first assessment of Trypanosoma species in NHP of southern Brazil.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTrypanosoma species research and implications · Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments · Vector-borne infectious diseases
Introduction
1
Non-human primates (NHPs) may be infected and participate in transmission cycle of zoonotic pathogens, as reported for rabies virus (1), Leishmania spp. (2), Yellow fever (3), Mayaro fever (4), and Trypanosoma spp. (5). Due to the phylogenetic proximity with humans and increased interaction with humans and vectors in periurban and urban areas (6), NHP infections by Trypanosoma spp. have been assessed in rural and periurban areas, along with wildlife centers and zoological gardens (6).
NHPs have been considered as sylvatic hosts of Trypanosoma spp. in South America, particularly of Trypanosoma cruzi, the protozoan agent of Chagas disease (5). T. cruzi infection has been reported in both free-ranging and captive primates of Brazil, including 17/26 (65.4%) primates from the Brasília Zoo, central-western region (7), 14/112 (12.5%) from Amapá, Pará, and Amazonas states, northern Brazil (8). A high diversity of natural trypanosome infection has been indicated in the Brazilian Amazon, with 22/46 (47.8%) NHPs infected by T. cruzi, T. minasense, T. devei and T. rangeli at the National Center of Primates, Pará State (5). In addition, 2/38 (5.3%) free-ranging and captive primates from the Mato Grosso State, central-western Brazil, were positive to T. minasense and T. rangeli (9). T. minasense has been considered one of the most common and highly specific parasites of NHP hosts, reportedly presenting low and persistent parasitemia (10). In addition, T. minasense has been identified as a primitive Trypanosoma species, with highly similar 18S rRNA to T. grayi and T. avium, respectively reptile and avian parasites (10).
Trypasonoma spp. infection in captive NHPs may contribute to infection and spreading in non-endemic areas, besides the potential zoonotic source for handling keepers, biologists and veterinarians (7). Accordingly, the present study aimed to assess and identify Trypanosoma spp. infection in a colony of captive, black-faced black spider monkeys (Ateles chamek) kept at the Zoological Garden of Curitiba, southern Brazil.
Method
2
Ethical statement
2.1
This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Use (protocol number 071/2021) at the Federal University of Paraná and included as part of the surveillance activities of the Curitiba City Secretary of Environment.
Study area
2.2
The present study was conducted in the Zoological Garden of Curitiba (25° 33′ 38″ S, 49° 14′ 07″ W), Curitiba, Paraná State, southern Brazil, which kept at the time approximately 2,300 animals of 300 species, distributed across 589,000 square meters (11, 12). Curitiba was ranked at the time the ninth most populated city in Brazil, with estimated population of 1.8 million habitants, presenting the tenth highest Human Development Index (HDI) with 0.783, out of 5,565 municipalities of Brazil (13). Although categorized as a 100% urban area city, Curitiba has been environmentally friendly and frequently ranked as first in sustainability and quality of life in Brazil, with a high green-area ratio throughout more than 40 in-city parks and preservation areas (14). Curitiba has presented a classically humid subtropical highland climate (Köppen: Cfb), with mild winters (average 19°C) and summers (average 25°C) due to low latitude, apart from the typically temperate climate (15).
Blood samples
2.3
Peripheral blood samples (3 mL) of black-faced black spider monkeys (Figure 1) were collected in 2021 by femoral puncture and performed by certified veterinarians, after physical restraint and inhalatory anesthesia with isoflurane (Figure 2). Blood samples were placed into EDTA tubes, separated into aliquots and stored at −20°C until testing.
Captive black-faced black spider monkeys at the Zoological Garden of Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Blood samplings of black-faced black spider monkeys in the Veterinary Section, Zoological Garden of Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Molecular analyses
2.4
DNA was extracted from blood using the commercial kit, DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), following manufacturer instructions.
A total of 5 μL of extracted DNA was submitted to Nested-PCR 18S rDNA as target in two rounds, with 8.5 uL of commercially available enzyme (Go Taq Master Mix Promega, Madison, WI, USA) used for the reaction, a premixed ready-to-use solution containing bacterially derived Taq DNA polymerase, dNTPs, MgCl2 and reaction buffers (16). A 0.5 μL volume of commercially available primers (Eurofins Genomics, Louisville, KY, USA) TRY R (5’CTACTGGGCAGCTTGGA3’) and F (5’GAAACAAGAAAC ACGGGAG3’) were used in the first round, and 0.5 μL of SSU R (5’CTGAGACTGTAACCTCAAAGC3’) and F (5’TGGGATAACAAA GGAGCA3’) in the second round. For the second round, 5 μL of amplified DNA with 1:10 of concentration was used. Both rounds were completed with 30 cycles, initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 60 s, 72°C for 90 s, 72°C for 10 min and kept at 4°C.
Amplified samples were purified using a commercial kit and Gel Band Purification (Illustra GFX PCR DNA GE Healthcare, Illinois, EUA), following the manufacturer protocol. Samples were sequenced by the Sanger method with a commercial kit (BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing, Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) on a commercial sequencer (ABI 3730 DNA, Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) available at the PDTIS/Fiocruz sequencing platform. DNA sequences were analyzed using SeqManTM program 7.0 version (DNASTAR, Madison, Wisconsin, EUA) and BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor v. 7.225 (17).
Phylogenetic analysis
2.5
The obtained consensus sequences were manually edited using the SeqMan-DNA Star Program and compared for similarity with sequences deposited in the GenBank database from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), using the BLAST algorithm (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool). For species identification, the following values were adopted: cover (≥99%), identity (≥99%), and E-value (0.0). Sequence alignment was performed using the muscle method in the MEGA11 program, and the phylogenetic analysis of 18S rDNA gene sequences was performed by maximum likelihood (ML) to confirm the characterization of trypanosomatid species with the Kimura 2-parameter model and Gamma distribution to model evolutionary rate differences among sites [4 categories (+G, parameter = 0.2566)]. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together was shown next to the branches of the figure.
The initial tree(s) for heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The tree was drawn to a scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA11. To support the branch, ultrafast bootstrapping of 5,000 replications with 1,000 maximum interactions. Representative sequences from GenBank were used for the construction of the phylogenetic tree, among all the sequences obtained in this study.
Results
3
The full population of 17 healthy, black-faced spider monkeys kept at the time in the Zoological Garden of Curitiba were sampled, with 4/17 (23.5%) positive animals by PCR to Trypanosoma spp. infection, including two males and two females, with ages ranging from four to 25 years-old. All sampled animals were born at the Zoological Garden of Curitiba with no historic displacement. Although vertical transmission should be considered, both mothers of sampled animals have died long before samplings herein. Results of 18S rDNA sequencing have shown Trypanosoma minasense infection, confirmed by BLAST algorithm and deposited at GenBank (numbers PQ038845; PQ038846; PQ038847; PQ038848). A phylogenetic tree based on 18 S rRNA gene sequences was constructed (Figure 3). Mutations were considered synonymous, as the percentage of identity between the sequences obtained and the sequences deposited at NCBI presented nearly 100% identity (PQ038845 - Identity: 99.56%; PQ038846 - Identity: 99.64%; PQ038847 - Identity: 99.45%; PQ038848 - Identity: 99.11%).
Phylogenetic tree of 18S rDNA gene sequences indicating the phylogenetic position of trypanosomatids characterized as Trypanosoma minasense (represented in green).
Discussion
4
This is the first report of T. minasense in black-faced black spider monkeys worldwide and the first study accessing Trypanosoma species in NHP of southern Brazil.
In the present study, all positive primates were infected by T. minasense, trypanosomatid from Megatrypanum subgenera reported to infect several monkey families in South America (18). In Brazil, previous studies have shown natural infection by T. minasense in approximately 30 different Neotropical primates, including Callithrix penicillata jordani and Callithrix geoffroyi in southern (19), Callithrix penicillata trapped in southeastern (20), Callithrix geoffroyi (19), Saimiri sciureus in northern (21), Sapajus paella in central-western (9), and Alouatta caraya in southeastern Brazil (22). T. minasense was also previously detected in NHP of Brazilian botanical gardens and conservation institutions, including Callithrix spp. from Rio de Janeiro, southeastern region (23), and different species kept at the National Center of Primates, Pará State, northern Brazilian region (5). Infection of T. minasense was also reported in other South American countries, including Alouatta caraya in Argentina (24), Alouatta palliata in Costa Rica (25) and Leontocebus weddelli in Peru (26). Although very frequent in NHP from different geographical areas, the mode of transmission and potential vectors of T. minasense are still unknown (27).
Trypanosoma minasense has been classified as a primitive and non-pathogenic species, being commonly detected in NHP (28). As T. minasense may not be able to infect blood-sucking triatomines, information about which vectors could be involved or other transmission routes remains unclear (28). As primate hosts of T. minasense have been primarily arboreal, arboreous insects have been indicated as potential vectors (27). No clinical signs have been observed in naturally infected primates (29), nor human infection by T. minasense reported to date (20). All sampled animals herein were born in captivity at the Zoological Garden of Curitiba, excluding the possibility of previous or outside infection. Thus, the ecological environment in which the Zoological Garden of Curitiba is inserted, enable T. minasense transmission, either associated to an unknown vector or even derived from direct contact between these NHP. In addition, insects and other potential vectors should be further investigated by entomological surveillance and molecular testing, to fully establish T. minasense spreaders and reservoirs.
Herein, Trypanosoma spp. infection, including by T. minasense, was reported for the first time in spider monkeys. The black-faced black spider monkey has been currently classified as Endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (30), mostly related to hunting and habitat loss due to agricultural expansion, with 50% decline in population over the past 45 years (30). In Brazil, this species has been distributed within transitional regions among Amazonia, Cerrado and Pantanal biomes (31). As previously suggested for different NHP species, the overall absence of clinical signs and low or null levels of pathogenicity have not itself supported additional risks and parasite impact on NHP species (23, 32), including the spider monkey population surveyed herein.
Although T. minasense has been classified as a primitive and non-pathogenic species commonly detected in NHP, the transmission routes and consequences for coinfection with Trypanosoma cruzi remain unclear. Thus, surveillance of Trypanosoma spp. infection should be always considered in both captive and free-range non-human primates to establish such transmission routes, besides host and vector species involved.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Kotait I Oliveira RN Carrieri ML Castilho JG Macedo CIPMCP. Non-human primates as a reservoir for rabies virus in Brazil. Zoonoses Public Health. (2019) 66:47–59. doi: 10.1111/zph.1252730288933 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Malta MCC Tinoco HP Xavier MN Vieira ALS CostaÉA Santos RL. Naturally acquired visceral leishmaniasis in non-human primates in Brazil. Vet Parasitol. (2010) 169:193–7. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.12.016, PMID: 20056328 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Tranquilin MV Lehmkuhl RC MaronÂDa SLR Ziliotto L Seki MC. First report of yellow fever virus in non-human primates in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. (2013) 46:522–4. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0106-2013, PMID: 23982102 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Celone M Okech B Han BA Forshey BM Anyamba A Dunford J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the potential non-human animal reservoirs and arthropod vectors of the Mayaro virus. P Lo S Negl Trop Dis. (2021) 15:e 0010016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010016, PMID: 34898602 PMC 8699665 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Ziccardi M Lourenço-De-Oliveira R Lainson R Brígido MC Muniz JA. Trypanosomes of non-human primates from the National Centre of Primates, Ananindeua, state of Pará, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. (2000) 95:157–9. doi: 10.1590/S 0074-02762000000200004, PMID: 10733732 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Chaves Adel Carmen V-SM Ayala JRS ChavesÓM Bicca-Marques JC Solórzano-García B. Neotropical Primates and humans: risk of bidirectional parasite transmission and disease sharing in fragmented and pristine landscapes In: Acosta-Jamett G Chaves A, editors. Ecology of wildlife diseases in the Neotropics. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2024). 213–53.
- 7Minuzzi-Souza TTC Nitz N Knox MB Reis F Hagström L Cuba Cuba CA. Vector-borne transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi among captive Neotropical primates in a Brazilian zoo. Parasit Vectors. (2016) 9:39. doi: 10.1186/s 13071-016-1334-7, PMID: 26813657 PMC 4727406 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Bahia Mde Nazaré Leite Barros F Magalhães-Matos P Cde Souza Gonçalves T Chiesorin Neto LDCLOF. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in captive Neotropical primates in the Brazilian Amazon. Am J Primatol. (2017) 79:1–6. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22590, PMID: 27802362 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
