# Merging of the Fukushima Health Management Survey With the National and Local Cancer Registry to Refine the Detection of Thyroid Cancer Cases After the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident

## TL;DR

This study combines health survey data with cancer registries to better track thyroid cancer cases in Fukushima after the 2011 nuclear accident.

## Contribution

The study introduces a method to merge individual-level data from health surveys and cancer registries to improve thyroid cancer detection accuracy.

## Key findings

- 212 thyroid cancer cases were identified in the FHMS by 2018, with 42 additional cases found in cancer registries.
- The National Cancer Registry captured more cases than the Fukushima Prefectural Cancer Registry after 2016.
- Merging data from both sources is essential for a more accurate detection of thyroid cancer cases.

## Abstract

After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in 2011, the Fukushima Health Management Survey (FHMS) was implemented in Fukushima Prefecture to promote long‐term health care. The FHMS included thyroid ultrasound examination (TUE) for individuals aged ≤ 18 years, including fetuses at the time of the accident. However, the FHMS may not have captured all cases of thyroid cancer because it only followed up with examinees. To address this gap, we aimed to merge individual‐level information from the FHMS with national and local cancer registries (CRs) to determine the limitations of the FHMS and CRs in capturing thyroid cancer cases.

The FHMS‐eligible residents' information was supplemented by merging and cross‐validating the FHMS and CR data using the Fukushima Prefectural Cancer Registry (FPCR), 2008–2015, and the National Cancer Registry (NCR), 2016–2018. For analysis, registered cases were classified into three groups: registered in both the CR and FHMS, or only in the CRs, or only in the FHMS. The characteristics of each case were evaluated in each database.

In the FHMS, 212 thyroid cancer cases were identified through 2018, with another 42 cases identified in the CRs. Of the 176 thyroid cancer cases registered until 2015, 28 (15.9%) were identified in the FHMS only and 13 (7.4%) in the FPCR only. Of the 78 additional cases identified since 2016, 29 (37.2%) were identified in the NCR only and 6 (7.7%) in the FHMS only. This indicates that the NCR captured the cases more efficiently than the FPCR.

Merging data from the FHMS and CRs at the individual level is necessary to capture thyroid cancer cases more accurately after the 2011 nuclear accident.