Effect of Centrality on Physical Activity in Late Childhood: A 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study

TL;DR

This study explores how a child's position in their friendship network affects changes in physical activity over one year.

Contribution

It identifies that children with high social closeness experience a greater decline in physical activity over time.

Findings

Children with higher closeness centrality showed a significant decrease in physical activity.

No significant association was found between betweenness or in-degree centrality and changes in physical activity.

The study suggests social network dynamics should be considered in physical activity interventions.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Engaging in physical activity (PA) is crucial for children’s physical and mental health, with PA in childhood influencing lifelong activity levels. However, PA during childhood tends to decrease with age. Childhood friendship networks influence various health behaviors, including physical activity. Centralities are objective measures of an individual’s position and role in friendship networks. The relationship between centrality and PA is inconsistent. This study aimed to determine how centrality affects changes in PA in late childhood longitudinally and to investigate the distribution of centrality in the network. Methods: This prospective cohort study recruited fourth- and fifth-grade children (9–11 years old). A total of 143 children participated. We calculated three centralities—in-degree, closeness, and betweenness—based on social network analysis (SNA). PA was assessed using the physical activity questionnaire for older children (PAQ-C). To explore the relationship between centralities and the percentage change in PA, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: Children with higher closeness had a significantly higher rate of decrease in PA after adjusting for confounding factors. There was no significant association between betweenness and percentage change in PA (p = 0.66) or in-degree and percentage change in PA (p = 0.21). Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of considering social network dynamics in PA interventions, particularly for children with high social closeness. Future research should incorporate objective PA measures and explore broader social networks to enhance intervention strategies, especially for Generation Z and Alpha, who experience unique opportunities and motivations for PA due to pervasive digital environments.

Figures