# Assessment of the Potential Role of Preoperative Dental Clearance in Total Joint Arthroplasty Optimization: A Pilot Study

## TL;DR

This pilot study suggests preoperative dental screening may reduce joint infections after hip and knee surgeries, but more research is needed.

## Contribution

The study explores the novel impact of preoperative dental clearance on periprosthetic joint infection rates in total joint arthroplasty.

## Key findings

- 30.1% of patients had preoperative dental pathology, with 90.3% requiring intervention.
- No periprosthetic joint infections were observed in the study cohort, which was unlikely for some groups based on historical data.
- Poisson probabilities suggest preoperative dental screening may reduce infection rates for THA, rTHA, and rTKA but not TKA.

## Abstract

Aims and objectives: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. This pilot study primarily aimed to investigate if preoperative dental screenings would impact the rate of PJI following TJA when compared to historical controls. Secondarily, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of dental pathology in patients undergoing TJA.

Methods: Charts from 103 consecutive patients undergoing primary or revision total hip arthroplasty (THA, rTHA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA, rTKA) by a single surgeon at a single academic institution over a two-year period were reviewed and selected for inclusion. All patients were referred to a dentist for preoperative clearance using a standardized form. The rate of dental pathology before surgery, details of the dental intervention required, and any dental work performed within six months postoperatively were evaluated. The demographic and comorbidity composition of our patient population was also collected. Finally, rates of PJI following each type of TJA were obtained for demographic- and comorbidity-matched historical controls from similar study designs to examine the potential impact of preoperative dental intervention.

Results: Of the 103 patients, 31 (30.1%) were found to have preoperative dental pathology. Twenty-eight of these 31 patients (90.3%) required dental intervention prior to surgery. Based on demographic- and comorbidity-matched historical data, we expected two (95% CI (0, 6)) PJI cases for the THA group, 0 (95% CI (0, 2)) PJI cases for the TKA group, two (95% CI (0, 5)) PJI cases for the rTHA group, and two (95% CI (0, 5)) PJI cases for the rTKA group. However, in our study, there were no PJIs after any TJA up to the latest follow-up, which was unlikely for THA, rTHA, and rTKA groups given the calculated Poisson probabilities (9.39%, 15.11%, and 11.26%, respectively). Finding 0 cases was likely for the TKA group given the calculated Poisson probability of 72.61%.

Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated that preoperative dental screening, which aims to decrease the chance of PJI due to bacteremia, may have an impact on the rate of PJI following THA, rTKA, and rTHA but not TKA based on Poisson probabilities calculated from demographic- and comorbidity-matched historical controls that lacked preoperative dental screening. For THA, rTKA, and rTHA, the Poisson probabilities of observing 0 cases of PJI postoperatively, as was the case in our study, were unlikely, suggesting that some variable in our cohort was decreasing the PJI rate for these groups. However, in the case of TKA, the Poisson probability of observing 0 cases was likely and matched the results of our study, suggesting that no variable in our cohort was affecting the PJI rate for this group. We cannot draw direct conclusions from this retrospective observational study, but the preliminary findings prompt further investigation through an appropriately controlled, blinded, multi-centered, and powered prospective randomized controlled trial.