# Evidence gaps among systematic reviews examining the relationship of race, ethnicity, and social determinants of health with adult inpatient quality measures

**Authors:** Sonali D. Advani, Alison G. Smith, Ibukunoluwa C. Kalu, Reinaldo Perez, Stephanie Hendren, Raymund B. Dantes, Jonathan R. Edwards, Minn Soe, Sarah H. Yi, Janine Young, Deverick J. Anderson

PMC · DOI: 10.1017/ash.2024.397 · 2024-09-23

## TL;DR

This paper identifies gaps in research on how race, ethnicity, and social factors affect inpatient healthcare quality.

## Contribution

It provides a systematic analysis of recent reviews to highlight underexplored areas in SDOH and inpatient quality measures.

## Key findings

- Only 39 of 472 reviews focused on race, ethnicity, and SDOH in inpatient care.
- Few reviews examined medication errors or healthcare-associated infections.
- Key SDOH like economic stability and neighborhood were rarely assessed.

## Abstract

The field of healthcare epidemiology is increasingly focused on identifying, characterizing, and addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) to address inequities in healthcare quality. To identify evidence gaps, we examined recent systematic reviews examining the association of race, ethnicity, and SDOH with inpatient quality measures.

We searched Medline via OVID for English language systematic reviews from 2010 to 2022 addressing race, ethnicity, or SDOH domains and inpatient quality measures in adults using specific topic questions. We imported all citations to Covidence (www.covidence.org, Veritas Health Innovation) and removed duplicates. Two blinded reviewers assessed all articles for inclusion in 2 phases: title/abstract, then full-text review. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer.

Of 472 systematic reviews identified, 39 were included. Of these, 23 examined all-cause mortality; 6 examined 30-day readmission rates; 4 examined length of stay, 4 examined falls, 2 examined surgical site infections (SSIs) and one review examined risk of venous thromboembolism. The most evaluated SDOH measures were sex (n = 9), income and/or employment status (n = 9), age (n = 6), race and ethnicity (n = 6), and education (n = 5). No systematic reviews assessed medication use errors or healthcare-associated infections. We found very limited assessment of other SDOH measures such as economic stability, neighborhood, and health system access.

A limited number of systematic reviews have examined the association of race, ethnicity and SDOH measures with inpatient quality measures, and existing reviews highlight wide variability in reporting. Future systematic evaluations of SDOH measures are needed to better understand the relationships with inpatient quality measures.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** SSIs (MESH:D013530), infections (MESH:D007239), venous thromboembolism (MESH:D054556)

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11427999/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11427999