# Evaluation of Right Ventricular Myocardial Properties Using Systolic Myocardial T1 Mapping

## TL;DR

This study shows that measuring right ventricular T1 values during systole can help assess heart muscle damage in patients with right ventricular overload.

## Contribution

The study introduces systolic T1 mapping as a novel method to evaluate right ventricular myocardial properties.

## Key findings

- Right ventricular systolic nT1 was significantly higher in patients with right ventricular overload compared to healthy volunteers.
- Right ventricular nT1 changes between diastole and systole due to blood effects, unlike the left ventricle.
- Systolic T1 mapping can detect myocardial damage caused by right ventricular stress.

## Abstract

Introduction

Myocardial properties can be quantitatively evaluated using myocardial native T1 values (nT1) obtained using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). In terms of myocardial wall thickness, the left ventricular nT1 is easy to measure, but the right ventricular nT1 is difficult. Patients with congenital heart disease often develop right ventricular overload. If right ventricular nT1 can be measured consistently, inflammation and fibrosis of the right ventricular myocardium can be quantitatively evaluated. We aimed to determine whether T1 mapping during systole can be used to evaluate right ventricular myocardial properties.

Methods

T1 mapping was performed at diastole and systole. Systolic T1 mapping was calculated from diastolic T1 mapping and cine images. The myocardial properties of both ventricles were evaluated in 13 healthy volunteers (21-26 years old) and 12 patients with right ventricular overload (12-41 years old) who underwent CMR examination at our hospital.

Results

From the analysis of left ventricular nT1, we found that nT1 did not change significantly during the cardiac cycle. However, right ventricular nT1 changed between diastole and systole because the right ventricle is affected by blood. Although there was no difference in right ventricular diastolic nT1 between the patients and volunteers (1,346.8 vs. 1,347.6 ms, p = 0.852), the right ventricular systolic nT1 was significantly higher in patients than in volunteers (1,312.7 vs. 1,233.8 ms, p = 0.002). This indicates that right ventricular myocardial damage occurs in patients with right ventricular overload.

Conclusion

Systolic right ventricular myocardial T1 mapping allows assessment of right ventricular myocardial properties. The right ventricular myocardial systolic nT1 is useful for evaluating myocardial damage due to right ventricular stress and myocardial injury. Measuring right ventricular nT1 may allow consideration of early therapeutic intervention.