# Splenectomy as a Risk Factor for Graft Rejection Following Endothelial Transplantation: Retrospective Study

## TL;DR

This study found that splenectomy does not significantly increase the risk of graft rejection after DMEK surgery in humans.

## Contribution

The study is the first to investigate the impact of splenectomy on DMEK outcomes in humans.

## Key findings

- Splenectomy did not significantly affect graft survival or rejection rates after DMEK.
- Only 16 splenectomized patients were included, which may limit the detection of minor effects.
- ACAID may not be the primary reason for the favorable immune outcomes in DMEK.

## Abstract

Anterior chamber–associated immune deviation (ACAID) is an active immunotolerance mechanism, which is induced by placing antigen into the anterior eye chamber as long as a major surgical trauma is avoided. For this reason, ACAID may be a major contributor to the favorable immunologic outcomes in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Rodent models have demonstrated the importance of a functional spleen for the development of an ACAID.

This study aimed to investigate whether splenectomy leads to increased rejection rates after DMEK in humans.

A retrospective evaluation was conducted on the course following DMEK at the Eye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, for patients with a self-reported history of splenectomy compared to patients without this condition. Potential study patients were contacted by mail. A questionnaire to self-report splenectomy and the time thereof was sent out. The medical records of all consenting patients at the Eye Center were reviewed for graft survival and immune reactions.

We asked 1818 patients after DMEK to report their history of splenectomy. A total of 1340 patients responded and were included in the study. Of these 1340 patients, 16 (1.2%) reported a history of splenectomy (ie, 26 DMEKs, with 10 patients being transplanted in both eyes and 6 patients being transplanted in 1 eye; median age at surgery 73.7, range 66.7-76.1 y). The remaining patients (1324 patients, ie, 1941 eyes) served as controls, with 1941 DMEKs (median age at surgery 71.5, range 64.1-77.2 y). Five (19%) out of the 26 eyes from the splenectomy group required a second transplant due to dislocation (n=2.8%), failure (n=2.8%), and rejection (n=1.4%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no relevant difference compared with controls.

Our results suggest that splenectomy has no major effect on the outcome following DMEK. Subsequent, ACAID may not be the main reason for the favorable immunological outcomes in DMEK, or the camero-splenic axis may be subordinate in humans. However, we only included 16 patients who underwent splenectomy, so it might be possible that we missed a minor effect.