Reconstruction of Chronic Soft Tissue Mallet Fingers: Outcomes of Step-Plasty vs. Purse-String Suture
Wolfram Demmer, Andreas Frick, Rüdiger G. H. Baumeister, Elisabeth Haas-Lützenberger, Nikolaus Thierfelder, Sinan Mert, Denis Ehrl, Riccardo Giunta, Christiane G. Stäuble

TL;DR
This study compares two surgical techniques for chronic mallet finger and finds that step-plasty provides better functional and aesthetic outcomes than purse-string sutures.
Contribution
The study introduces step-plasty as a novel surgical technique for chronic mallet finger with superior functional and aesthetic outcomes.
Findings
Step-plasty reduced extension deficit from 42 to 11 degrees, better than purse-string sutures (15 degrees).
Step-plasty achieved better aesthetic and functional results according to Levante’s criteria.
Step-plasty did not require skin resection, unlike other established procedures.
Abstract
After failed conservative therapy or in the absence of any intervention, a rupture of the digital subcutaneous extensor tendon at the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, known as mallet finger, may lead to a chronic extension deficit due to excessive scarring and tendon elongation. Various surgical techniques to restore the extension of the distal phalanx have been proposed, but an optimal approach has not yet been established. To tighten the extensor tendon, a purse-string suture can be applied. Although it has shown efficacy, it can result in significant bulging and scar formation. Using the “abbreviato” technique, the elongated part of the extensor tendon is excised, and the tendon is re-sutured. Also, tenodesis has been described, particularly in pediatric cases. In this retrospective follow-up study, we aimed to investigate if the step-plasty procedure previously described by…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
