Comparison of the Effects of Different Palatal Morphology on Maxillary Expansion via RME and MSE: A Finite Element Analysis

TL;DR

This paper uses computer modeling to compare how different roof-of-mouth shapes affect dental expansion techniques, focusing on stress and movement patterns.

Contribution

The study introduces a finite element analysis comparing RME and MSE effects on maxillary expansion under varying palatal morphologies.

Findings

High-palate morphology increases lateral displacement and stress concentration with RME.

MSE shows greater lateral palatal suture displacement compared to RME.

RME under normal palate increases crown/root ratio and tooth tipping, while MSE offers better vertical control.

Abstract

This study aims to compare and analyze the biomechanical effect and the displacement trend of RME and MSE on the maxillofacial complex under different palatal shapes by using finite element analysis.

The three‐dimensional model of maxillofacial complex was obtained from a computed tomography image of a person with a normal palate. Then, we modified the shape of the palate to obtain the model with a high palate. Additionally, two expander devices were considered. MSE and RME were created and four models were made: Model 1: Normal‐palate craniomaxillofacial complex with RME expander; Model 2: Normal‐palate craniomaxillofacial complex with MSE expander; Model 3: High‐palate craniomaxillofacial complex with RME expander; Model 4: High‐palate craniomaxillofacial complex with MSE expander. Then, lateral forced displacement was applied and the analysis results were obtained.

The lateral displacement of the palatal suture of Model 3 is greater than that of Model 1, and the maxilla has more rotation. The crown/root ratio of Model 1 is significantly greater than that of the other three groups. Compared with Model 1, Model 3 has greater stress concentration in the superstructure of the craniomaxillofacial complex. Both of them have greater stress in the anchorage area than Model 2 and Model 4.

Different shapes of the palate interfere with the effects of RME and MSE, and its influence on the stress distribution and displacement of the craniomaxillary complex when using RME is greater than MSE. The lateral displacement of the palatal suture of MSE is significantly larger than that of RME. It is more prone to tipping movement of the anchor teeth using RME under normal palate, and MSE may manage the vertical control better due to the smaller crown/root ratio than RME and intrusive movement of molars.

Figures