# Quantitation of mitral regurgitation using positron emission tomography

**Authors:** Jonathan Sigfridsson, Tomasz Baron, Johannes Bergsten, Hendrik J. Harms, Jonny Nordström, Tanja Kero, Patrik Svanström, Elin Lindström, Lieuwe Appel, My Jonasson, Mark Lubberink, Frank A. Flachskampf, Jens Sörensen

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01150-1 · 2024-09-18

## TL;DR

This study shows that PET scans can accurately measure the severity of mitral valve regurgitation, matching results from MRI scans.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a novel method to quantify mitral regurgitation using PET, validated against cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

## Key findings

- PET-based regurgitant volume and fraction strongly correlated with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) measurements.
- PET measurements showed high accuracy in distinguishing patients with mitral regurgitation from healthy volunteers.
- A systematic underestimation of regurgitant volume and fraction was observed in PET compared to CMR.

## Abstract

Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) offers non-invasive assessment of perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function from a single dynamic scan. However, no prior assessment of mitral regurgitation severity by PET has been presented. Application of indicator dilution techniques and gated image analyses to PET data enables calculation of forward stroke volume and total LV stroke volume. We aimed to evaluate a combination of these methods for measurement of regurgitant volume (RegVol) and fraction (RegF) using dynamic 15O-water and 11C-acetate PET in comparison to cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).

Twenty-one patients with severe primary mitral valve regurgitation underwent same-day dynamic PET examinations (15O-water and 11C-acetate) and CMR. PET data were reconstructed into dynamic series with short time frames during the first pass, gated 15O-water blood pool images, and gated 11C-acetate myocardial uptake images. PET-based RegVol and RegF correlated strongly with CMR (RegVol: 15O-water r = 0.94, 11C-acetate r = 0.91 and RegF: 15O-water r = 0.88, 11C-acetate r = 0.84, p < 0.001). A systematic underestimation (bias) was found for PET (RegVol: 15O-water − 11 ± 13 mL, p = 0.002, 11C-acetate − 28 ± 16 mL, p < 0.001 and RegF: 15O-water − 4 ± 6%, p = 0.01, 11C-acetate − 10 ± 7%, p < 0.001). PET measurements in patients were compared to healthy volunteers (n = 18). Mean RegVol and RegF was significantly lower in healthy volunteers compared to patients for both tracers. The accuracy of diagnosing moderately elevated regurgitant volume (> 30mL) was 95% for 15O-water and 92% for 11C-acetate.

LV regurgitation severity quantified using cardiac PET correlated with CMR and showed high accuracy for discriminating patients from healthy volunteers.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-024-01150-1.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** 15O-water (PubChem CID 10129877), 11C-acetate (PubChem CID 450349)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** mitral regurgitation (MESH:D008944), LV regurgitation (MESH:D018487), stroke (MESH:D020521)
- **Chemicals:** 11C-acetate (MESH:C438206), 15O-water (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11411051/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11411051