# A protocol for a scoping review to identify methods used in clinical practice to assess wound odour

## TL;DR

This study aims to identify current methods used in wound assessment tools to evaluate wound odor, which is a distressing symptom for patients and lacks a standardized approach.

## Contribution

The novelty lies in systematically mapping existing methods for wound odor assessment to inform future consensus on a preferred method.

## Key findings

- The review will compile a list of methods used to assess wound odor from various wound assessment tools.
- Results will be presented in a narrative summary and PRISMA diagram to visualize the search strategy outcomes.
- The findings will inform a subsequent Delphi study to establish consensus on odor assessment methods.

## Abstract

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to map, from wound assessment tools and other literature, the current methods used to assess wound odour in order to answer the following question: Which methods of assessment, validated or otherwise, are currently used in wound assessment tools to assess wound odour?

Introduction: Wound assessment includes not only details of the condition of the wound bed but also evaluation of symptoms associated with the wound including that of odour. Odour is cited by clinicians, patients and carers as one of the most distressing wound symptoms. However, there is no consensus on a preferred method to assess odour thus negatively impacting the internal and external validity of many clinical trials and minimising the ability to perform meta-analysis.

Eligibility criteria: Any wound assessment tool or framework that includes assessment of wound odour in any wound aetiology and in any care setting. Any systematic or scoping review that includes assessment of wound odour in any wound aetiology and in any care setting. No limits on date of publication or language will be applied.

Methods: We will employ the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines for this scoping review and base its structure on the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley.

Results: A narrative format will summarise extracted data and provide an overview of tools used to assess wound odour. A PRISMA diagram will outline the results of the search strategy. The identified tools will be summarised in table format and stratified according to methods used.

Conclusion: The result of this scoping review will be a list of methods used to assess odour in wounds and will be used to inform a subsequent Delphi study to gain consensus on the preferred method to assess wound odour.