Face and content validity of a holistic assessment questionnaire to assess cancer-related fatigue after breast cancer
Kim A.E. Wijlens, Annemieke Witteveen, Lian Beenhakker, Ester J.M. Siemerink, Reinoud Achterkamp, Sabine Siesling, Miriam M.R. Vollenbroek-Hutten, Christina Bode

TL;DR
This study validates a new questionnaire to assess cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer survivors, showing it is clear, relevant, and user-friendly.
Contribution
The study confirms the face and content validity of the Holistic Assessment of CRF (HA-CRF) questionnaire for breast cancer survivors.
Findings
Breast cancer survivors found the HA-CRF questionnaire helpful and easy to use, with minor suggestions for improvement.
Healthcare professionals rated 71% of items as very clear and 92% as relevant, indicating strong content validity.
The HA-CRF questionnaire took an average of 18 minutes to complete and provided a sense of openness and self-awareness.
Abstract
Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) affects the quality of life after breast cancer. In a previous study, we developed a 72-item questionnaire that assesses CRF from a holistic point of view; named the Holistic Assessment of CRF (HA-CRF) questionnaire. The current study assessed the face and content validity of the HA-CRF questionnaire. Using a mixed-method approach, ten breast cancer survivors (BCS) did a cognitive walkthrough of the HA-CRF via an app followed by a semi-structured interview about relevancy and essentiality (qualitative). In addition, ten health care professionals (HCPs) assessed the relevancy, clarity, and essentiality of each item via a questionnaire (quantitative). BCS indicated minor textual improvement for four items and six items were not completely clear. The app was considered easy to use and the HC-CRF was on average completed in 18 minutes. The HA-CRF questionnaire…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCancer survivorship and care · Head and Neck Cancer Studies · Health Education and Validation
