The Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Direct-Acting Antivirals for Chronic Hepatitis C in Patients Active Malignancies

TL;DR

This study shows that direct-acting antivirals are effective and safe for treating hepatitis C in cancer patients, except for those with liver cancer.

Contribution

The study provides real-world evidence on DAA efficacy and safety in patients with active malignancies, a scarcely described group.

Findings

DAA treatment was highly effective in patients with solid tumors and hematological diseases.

HCC patients had lower sustained virologic response rates and higher treatment discontinuations due to liver disease progression.

Extrahepatic symptoms and liver enzyme levels varied significantly among different cancer groups.

Abstract

In the era of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has become a curable disease. Eradication of the virus remains a major goal for the World Health Organization (WHO) by 2030. Main obstacles seem to be the lack of national screenings and shortage of knowledge among patients and healthcare professionals. There also remain, scarcely described in the literature, specific groups of patients who, due to their comorbidities such as malignant tumors, may not be considered as candidates eligible for DAA treatment. In our study, we aimed to characterize and present treatment efficacy in individuals with chronic hepatitis C and an active malignancy treated in Poland in years 2015–2020 with DAAs and compare their outcomes with a treated population with no active malignancy. The obtained results indicate high effectiveness and a low number of premature treatment discontinuations for the majority of patients with active malignancies, with some concerns around HCCs. We believe that data provided by this study will lead to more efficient elaboration of the standard of care in this population.

Background: Over the past years, the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) revolutionized chronic hepatitis C treatment. We aimed to characterize and assess treatment efficacy in three specific groups of patients treated with DAAs: those with active solid malignant tumors (SMTs), hematological diseases (HDs) and hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Methods: A total of 203 patients with active oncological disease (SMT n = 61, HD = 67, HCC n = 74) during DAA treatment in 2015–2020 selected from the EpiTer-2 database were analyzed retrospectively and compared to 12,983 patients without any active malignancy. Results: Extrahepatic symptoms were more frequent in HD patients (17.2% vs. SMT = 10.3%, HCC = 8.2%, without = 7.8%, p = 0.004). HCC patients characterized with the highest ALT activity (81 IU/L vs. SMT = 59.5 IU/L, HD = 52 IU/L, without = 58 IU/L, p = 0.001) more often had F4 fibrosis as well (86.11% vs. SMT = 23.3%, HD = 28.8%, controls = 24.4%, p = 0.001). A significant majority of subjects in HCC, HD and SMT populations completed the full treatment plan (HCC = 91%; n = 67, HD = 97%; n = 65, SMT = 100%; n = 62). Concerning the treatment efficacy, the overall sustained virologic response, excluding non-virologic failures, was reported in 93.6% HD, 90.16% SMT and 80.6% in HCC patients. Conclusions: As presented in our study, DAA therapy has proven to be highly effective and safe in patients with active SMTs and HDs. However, therapy discontinuations resulting from liver disease progression remain to be the major concern in HCC patients.

Figures