A Systematic Review of the Optimal Management of Pediatric Distal Radius Displacement Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Cast Placement

TL;DR

This study compares two treatments for broken bones in children's wrists, finding that the best option depends on the injury's severity and patient factors.

Contribution

A systematic review comparing ORIF and casting for pediatric distal radius fractures, emphasizing treatment decisions based on fracture specifics.

Findings

Higher displacement fractures benefit more from ORIF to avoid long-term complications.

The choice between ORIF and casting depends on fracture severity and patient age.

Neither treatment is clearly superior for long-term outcomes.

Abstract

Distal radius fractures are among the most common pediatric injuries, affecting thousands of children each year. These fractures often require clinical intervention to reduce displacement and ensure the proper healing of the growth plate and wrist bone. The primary objective of this comprehensive analysis is to compare the effectiveness of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus cast placement in the treatment of pediatric distal radius fractures, with the aim of identifying the optimal treatment approach. Therefore, a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted on pediatric distal radius displacement fractures using extensive database searches from 2000 to 2024 for specific keywords, ensuring transparency and reproducibility. Our findings indicate that higher displacement necessitates ORIF to minimize long-term complications and ensure better functional outcomes for pediatric patients. Rare studies comparing ORIF and cast placement are analyzed, emphasizing the advantages and limitations of each approach. The document concludes that the choice between ORIF and casting depends on factors such as fracture severity, patient's age, and specific characteristics of the injury to ensure optimal outcomes in pediatric distal radius fracture management. In conclusion, our data suggests that ORIF and cast placement each have pros and cons for pediatric distal radius fractures, with the best treatment depending on fracture specifics and patient factors, but neither method is clearly superior for long-term outcomes.

Figures