Corrigendum: Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study
Jakub Lickiewicz, Simone Agnes Efkemann, Tonje Lossius Husum, Tella Lantta, Luca Pingani, Richard Whittington
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —European Cooperation in Science and Technology 10.13039/501100000921
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEuropean and International Law Studies
In the published article, there was an error in the Acknowledgements section. This section previously stated:
“We thank our participants for their participation in our study.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“This article is based upon work from COST Action FOSTREN, CA19133, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology, www.cost.eu). We thank our participants for their participation in our study.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.